Multilevel Random Coefficient Analyses of Event- and Interval-Contingent Data in Social and Personality Psychology Research

By J. Nezlek. 2001

682 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8207c719d63c5c5c49017195ff7267b724fe6616

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Emotional Intelligence and Social Interaction (2004, methodology): “We followed a forward-stepping strategy (i.e., initial models contained a single predictor and additional predictors were added one at a time) because multilevel models estimate a large number of parameters and entering too many predictors can tax the carrying capacity of the data (e.g., Kreft & de ”
Emotional Responses to Art: From Collation and Arousal to Cognition and Emotion (2005, background): “Between-person and withinperson effects are mathematically distinct, and conventional between-person analyses need not replicate at the within-person level (see Nezlek, 2001).”
Motivations for promotion and prevention and the role of trust and commitment in interpersonal forgiveness (2010, methodology): “Therefore, results were analyzed using multilevel statistical models specifically designed for non-independent data (cf. Raudenbush & Bryk, 2002) and adapted for situations in which participants repeatedly answer the same series of questions (e.g., Nezlek, 2001).”
Interpersonal Injustice and Workplace Deviance (2012, methodology): “For the diary portion of the study, an interval-contingent experience sampling methodology was used (Nezlek, 2001) whereby participants were e-mailed links to the daily questionnaires at the end of each workday for 14 consecutive workdays.”
Separation of Performance-Approach and Performance-Avoidance Achievement Goals : A Broader Analysis. (2011, background): “Pooling scores of individuals in each situation without considering the multilevel nature of the data (situations nested within persons) would produce biased parameter estimates (Nezlek, 2001).”
Depression as a Moderator of Relationships between Positive Daily Events and Day-to-Day Psychological Adjustment (2001, methodology): “Descriptions of the advantages of MRCM over comparable OLS techniques and using MRCM to analyze daily diary data are presented in Nezlek (2001).”
Use of humor as a coping mechanism, psychological adjustment, and social interaction (2001, methodology): “For example, Nezlek et al. (1994) and Nezlek et al. (2000) found that quantity of interaction was unrelated to depression, and Nezlek (2001a) found that social skills were also unrelated to quantity of interaction.”
Global Warming and U.S. Crime Rates (2003, methodology): “This procedure is equivalent to group-centering in a multilevel or hierarchical linear model (Nezlek, 2001); that is, it converts observations into deviation scores around each state’s mean, which allowed us to examine temporal changes in temperature and crime that are uncorrupted by spatial…”
Cognitive Appraisals and Interest in Visual Art: Exploring an Appraisal Theory of Aesthetic Emotions (2005, methodology): “3; Nezlek, 2001).”
Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. (2007, background): “Within-person analyses fit our hypotheses—appraisal–emotion relations are presumed to covary within the person, not merely within the sample—and within-person analyses resist the ―third-variable problem‖ that besets between-person analyses (Nezlek, 2001).”
Momentary Happiness: The Role of Psychological Need Satisfaction (2011, methodology): “For all analyses and explanations of the results, the detailed advice proffered by Nezlek (2001) was followed in this study.”
A Practical Guide to Experience-Sampling Procedures (2003, background): “The ideal number of observations depends, in part, on whether you plan to estimate both within and between subject variance components (i.e., using multi-level modeling procedures; Byrk and Raudenbush, 1992; Nezlek, 2001).”
The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: a self-determination theory perspective. (2007, methodology): “For a detailed description and examples of this approach using event-contingent diary data, see Nezlek (2001).”
The Positive Relationship between Servant Leadership and Employees' Psychological Health: A Multi-Method Approach (2014, methodology): “We applied stepwise modeling with a random intercept and random slope (Hox, 2002; Nezlek, 2001).”