From Mental Game to Cultural Praxis: A Cultural Studies Model's Implications for the Future of Sport Psychology

By Tatiana Ryba, H. Wright. 2005

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Music, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81fa2b8448ee1a3aef387a86b87668f9432a8c76

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Music

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Citations in the corpus

Centralizing culture in cultural sport psychology research: The potential of narrative inquiry and discursive psychology (2015, background): “For now it can be noted that within CSP, cultural praxis is grounded in cultural studies (see Ryba & Wright, 2005), with the central tenet being to blend theory, lived culture, and social action to understand cultural identities as fluid and socially constructed within social interaction and…”
A critical review of career research and assistance through the cultural lens: towards cultural praxis of athletes' careers (2014, background): “Nevertheless, any project should be linked to relevant practice to ensure that empirical data and theory are informed by practice while, at the same time, contributing to a theory/researchdriven practice (Ryba & Wright, 2005; Schinke, McGannon, Parham, & Lane, 2012).”
Cultural sport psychology research: conceptions, evolutions, and forecasts (2015, methodology): “The privileging of some people over others was the result of a taken for granted way of ‘doing’ sport psychology steeped in a post-positivist, white, Euro-American, male, performance-based discourse (McGannon & Schinke, in press; Ryba & Schinke, 2009; Ryba & Wright, 2005).”
A meta-study of athletic identity research in sport psychology: Current status and future directions (2016, background): “For example, Ryba and Wright (2005) argued for rethinking athletic identity through cultural studies, emphasizing socio-cultural processes that were argued to constitute psychological functioning.”
Career development and transitions of athletes: the International Society of Sport Psychology Position Stand Revisited (2020, background): “…and the whole environment perspectives of the ACD, Stambulova and Ryba embedded their theorising in the cultural praxis heuristic (Ryba, 2017; Ryba & Wright, 2005; Ryba, Schinke, & Tenenbaum, 2010) to contextualise athlete subjectivity in lived culture and to mend the gap between theory and…”
ISSP Position Stand: Culturally competent research and practice in sport and exercise psychology (2013, background): “Cultural praxis, introduced in sport psychology by Ryba and Wright (2005, 2010), is “a critical discourse” and “an attempt to broaden the epistemological spectrum of theory and practice in the field” (2010, p. 3).”
Toward Cultural Praxis and Cultural Sensitivity: Strategies for Self-Reflexive Sport Psychology Practice (2012, background): “Without such a beginning, and with small lessons grounded in reflexive and reflective principles (e.g., how to converse as well as listen to perspectives and values different than our own), the practitioner might never move beyond mono-cultural sport practices (Ryba & Wright, 2005).”