Toward Cultural Praxis and Cultural Sensitivity: Strategies for Self-Reflexive Sport Psychology Practice

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Centralizing culture in cultural sport psychology research: The potential of narrative inquiry and discursive psychology (2015, background): “Finally, Schinke et al. (2012) engaged with cultural praxis through a confessional tale from a sport psychology consulting experience.”
A critical review of career research and assistance through the cultural lens: towards cultural praxis of athletes' careers (2014, background): “Fifth, the researchers should position themselves in the project and reflect on how their backgrounds and experiences influence development of the project in terms of its objectives, design, implementation, and interpretation of results obtained (Schinke et al., 2012).”
Cultural sport psychology research: conceptions, evolutions, and forecasts (2015, background): “Additionally, the power differentials that permeate traditional research efforts – particularly those relating to the privileging of whiteness4 and the researcher’s perspective – are counteracted (McGannon & Johnson, 2009; Ryba & Schinke, 2009; Schinke et al., 2012).”
ISSP Position Stand: Culturally competent research and practice in sport and exercise psychology (2013, background): “…et al., 2003), and relevant literature in cultural sport psychology (e.g. Ryba, 2009; Ryba & Schinke, 2009; Schinke, Hanrahan, & Catina, 2009; Schinke et al., 2012; Schinke & Moore, 2011; Si et al., 2011) three major areas of cultural competence for sport psychology practitioners can be…”