Boys, Literacies and Schooling: The Dangerous Territories of Gender-Based Literacy Reform

By Leonie Rowan. 2001

131 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The relationship between servant leadership, organisational citizenship behaviour and team effectiveness (2014, background): “Teachers who carry out educational activities in the class and who spend more time with learners have an important effect on learner academic performance (Rowan et al., 2002).”
Interrogating single‐sex classes as a strategy for addressing boys’ educational and social needs (2005, result): “This is in spite of research which highlights that such a strategy per se does not necessarily lead to enhancing boys’ educational or social outcomes (see Rennie & Parker, 1997; Martino & Meyenn, 2002; Lingard et al., 2002; Rowan et al., 2002; Warrington & Younger, 2003).”
The Problem of Boys' Literacy Underachievement: Raising Some Questions (2010, background): “Conceptualizing the crisis in this way as a win–lose dichotomy is both dangerous and misguided because it positions boys and girls in opposition to one another or as “competing victims” (Rowan et al., 2002, p. 16).”