Apparel product attributes, web browsing, and e-impulse buying on shopping websites

By Eun-Joo Park, Eun Young Kim, Venessa Funches, William K. Foxx. 2012

553 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/817f572ed96a9041e20b9bec43ee7dff9df3d866

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Engaging customers during a website visit: a model of website customer engagement (2016, background): “One stream (e.g. Loiacono et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2014; Park et al., 2012) have drawn from offline atmospherics literature, to consider the ‘silent language’ (Kotler, 1973: , p. 48) of online communication, with a view to designing website stimuli which produce desirable customer responses.”
Online impulse buying of tourism products: The role of web site personality, utilitarian and hedonic web browsing (2016, unknown): “Some scholars also argued that online shoppers are more spontaneous as compared to traditional store shoppers (Park et al., 2012; Verhagen and van Dolen, 2011).”
Impulse Buying Behaviors in Live Streaming Commerce Based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework (2021, background): “Path Coefficient t Value Result H1: Attractiveness –> Perceived Enjoyment 0.423 5.617 *** support H2: Trustworthiness –> Perceived Enjoyment 0.074 0.951 not support H3: Expertise –> Perceived Enjoyment 0.313 4.139 *** support H4: Product Usefulness –> Perceived Usefulness 0.178 2.434 * support H5: P”
The Effects of Personality Traits and Website Quality on Online Impulse Buying (2015, background): “…(Verhagen&vanDolen, 2011), the relationship among product attributes, web browsing, and impulse buying for apparel products in the Internet context (Park et al.,2011), influence of people’s mood in online shopping decisions (Huang& Kuo, 2012), web site cues effects on personality traits (Liu et…”
Factors Affecting Online Impulse Buying: Evidence from Chinese Social Commerce Environment (2018, background): “Some studies consider it as unidimensional construct [10,55,56] while some studies have taken into consideration the multidimensional construct in hedonic values [51,57].”
Theory of Islamic consumer behaviour: An empirical study of consumer behaviour of Islamic mortgage in Malaysia (2014, methodology): “Following Ramayah et al. (2011), convergent validity is measured using factor loadings, composite reliability and average variance extracted (AVE).”
A meta-analysis of consumer impulse buying (2014, background): “Thus, the urge during an impulse buy is extremely powerful and difficult to resist (e.g., Hoch and Loewenstein, 1991; Park et al., 2012; Rook, 1987; Rook and Fisher, 1995).”
The state of online impulse-buying research: A literature analysis (2017, background): “One stream of research measured pure online impulse buying using survey questionnaires [7, 25, 30, 35, 36, 44, 51, 53, 60].”
Shopping online without thinking: being emotional or rational? (2014, background): “Some of the studies assume hedonic shopping motivation as a unidimensional construct (Sarkar, 2011; Kim and Eastin, 2011; Park et al., 2012) while others use a multidimensional scale (Arnold and Reynolds, 2003; Kim, 2006; To et al.”