Ecological Implications of Minilivestock : Potential of Insects, Rodents, Frogs and Sails

By M. Paoletti. 2005

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8174d718b6672ea87c2b319a97abdd91120b8d33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. A. van Huis
2. R. Gahukar
3. J. Ramos-Elorduy
4. Matan Shelomi
5. A. Yen
6. D. Oonincx
7. J. Eilenberg
8. N. Turner

Citations in the corpus

• Entomophagy and human food security (2011, background): “Although ‘microlivestock/mini-livestock’ are not equivalent words to entomophagy, they are sometimes used to categorize the insects that can be eaten by human beings (Paoletti and Dufour, 2002; Paoletti, 2005; Srivastava et al., 2009).”
• Edible insects: Traditional knowledge or western phobia? (2009, background): “Over the last two decades, there have been several conferences and many publications on the human consumption of edible insects and other invertebrates (such as Paoletti 2005).”
• Processed products of termites and lake flies: improving entomophagy for food security within the lake victoria region (2010, background): “An edited book has been published with several authors discussing potential of insects as minilivestock [10].”
• The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed. A review (2017, background): “In Australia, honey ants and wood grubs (both Lepidoptera and Coleoptera) were important edible insect species for the aboriginals (Yen 2005; Yen et al. 2016).”
• Insect lipid profile: aqueous versus organic solvent-based extraction methods (2014, result): “Fatty acid composition The FA profiles found in the four insect species as analysed byGC-FID (Table 2) are in accordance with the profiles found in previous studies on lipids where high amounts of unsaturated FA (USFA) were found relative to saturated FA (SFA) (Finke, 2002; Paoletti, 2005; Rumpold &”
• Edible and Tended Wild Plants, Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Agroecology (2011, background): “In addition, an attitude is suggested to allow choices from the potentially available biodiversity of a set of species that are acceptable within a group and have acquired status within small human communities over time (Paoletti, 2005; Paoletti and Dufour, 2005).”
• ‘Entomophagy’: an evolving terminology in need of review (2015, background): “The term ‘minilivestock’ has already been proposed by Paoletti (2005) and others, which also encompasses ‘rodents, frogs, and snails.’”
• Anthropo‐entomophagy: Cultures, evolution and sustainability (2009, background): “In the Paleolithic, human beings were an example of social, but not economic, equality (Tommaseo-Ponzetta 2005).”
• Why we still don't eat insects: Assessing entomophagy promotion through a diffusion of innovations framework (2015, background): “Such arguments do not match the way insects are prepared, and can also be used to promote other, greener lifestyles which themselves are struggling with diffusion (Paoletti, 2005; Tucker, 2014).”