Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons

By Nachum Ulanovsky, Liora Las, Israel Nelken. Nature Neuroscience, 2003

1,053 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8129f19ccd3cfea52fc8f0524e81136d94485b62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Synaptic plasticity and dysconnection in schizophrenia. (2006, background): “In terms of the neural mechanisms underlying MMN, some studies have suggested that it could result from stimulus-specific adaptation of neurons in primary auditory cortex (Ulanovsky et al 2003; Jääskeläinen et al 2004), possibly due to neuronal refractoriness and lateral inhibition (May et al 1999).”
Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities (2009, background): “The local effect essentially fitted with the MMN network in auditory cortex, whereas the global effect was subtended by the activity of a global workspace network, particu- 1674 www.pnas.org cgi doi 10.1073 pnas.0809667106 Bekinschtein et al. larly involving prefrontal cortex, and previously associa”
Prior Expectation Mediates Neural Adaptation to Repeated Sounds in the Auditory Cortex: An MEG Study (2011, result): “Generally, our findings are well in line with earlier work that has shown that probability can have large effects on early cortical processing in the auditory cortex, both in nonhuman (Ulanovsky et al., 2003) and human (Haenschel et al.”
The functional anatomy of the MMN: A DCM study of the roving paradigm (2008, background): “Changes in intrinsic connectivity are consistent with the idea that stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) in A1 contributes to the emergence of the MMN (Ulanovsky et al., 2003).”
How Prediction Errors Shape Perception, Attention, and Motivation (2012, background): “, 2010; Meyer and Olson, 2011), auditory (Ulanovsky et al., 2003; Baldeweg, 2006; Todorovic et al., 2011), and somatosensory perception (Akatsuka et al.”
Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence. (2005, neutral): “posed by several authors (Desimone, 1992; Näätänen, 1990, 1992; Ulanovsky et al., 2003), and now by Jääskeläinen et al.”
Predictive Processing: A Canonical Cortical Computation (2018, neutral): “, 2010; Meyer and Olson, 2011), or after frequent presentation of the same stimulus, in which case the suppression is often described as sensory adaptation (Ulanovsky et al., 2003).”
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. (2007, background): “In contrast, frequency-dependent responses were recorded from Area 41 and responses to rarity per se (i.e., a larger response to deviants alone at their typical long intervals than the response to these stimuli alone at short intervals) from Area 42 (cf. Ulanovsky et al., 2003).”
Multiple Time Scales of Adaptation in Auditory Cortex Neurons (2004, methodology): “These data suggest that the neuronal responses in MGB do not adapt to stimulus history on time scales of seconds or longer .”
Neural processing of natural sounds (2014, background): “At higher levels of the auditory system, however, neural responses can be dominated by contextual effects [8,39,40]; although sound features that drive neurons might be present in white-noise, they might only elicit responses when they are presented in a natural acoustic context, for example, follow”
ERP Repetition Effects and Mismatch Negativity Generation A Predictive Coding Perspective (2007, background): “Specifically, Ulanovsky et al. (2003) discussed the existence of two separate forms of adaptation (SSA): a subcortical form with coarse stimulus specificity, requiring continuous stimulation or only short gaps, and cortical SSA, which develops rapidly, has a long onset latency, long memory (more…”
Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex (2003, result): “These negative results, obtained in both naive and non-behaving trained animals, argue against the possibility that the facilitation we observed in the trained, behaving animals was due to an auditory 'oddball effect”
Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds. (2004, background): “This is indicated by the observed relationships of onset latency and the period of intrinsic oscillations with BMF as well as the effects of spectral and temporal stimulus composition on cortical adaptation behavior (19, 280).”
Nonlinearities and Contextual Influences in Auditory Cortical Responses Modeled with Multilinear Spectrotemporal Methods (2008, neutral): “Longer time scales of adaptation also exist in A1 (McKenna et al., 1989; Ulanovsky et al., 2003; Bartlett and Wang, 2005), but were not studied here.”