Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities

By T. Bekinschtein, Stanislas Dehaene, B. Rohaut, François Tadel, Leonardo G. Cohen, Lionel Naccache. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009

672 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6b8191a781e324952797513ee91799bd12c518b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis (2020, background): “later prediction error (P3 wave) when the global sequence is violated only under conscious conditions (local/global paradigm) (Bekinschtein et al., 2009; Chao et al., 2018).”
Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis (2011, methodology): “Some recent publications using Brainstorm as a main analysis software tool are listed in [20–26].”
Why the Global Availability of Mind Wandering Necessitates Resource Competition: Reply to McVay and Kane (2010) (2010, background): “…the controlfailure hypothesis needs to assume a global workspace that can be both coupled and decoupled from the processes of cognitive control (see also Bekinschtein et al., 2009, for a demonstration of how mind wandering can prevent external information from accessing the global workspace).”
Prior Expectation Mediates Neural Adaptation to Repeated Sounds in the Auditory Cortex: An MEG Study (2011, background): “At a later processing stage, both forms of surprise are associated with a more widespread and later ( 300 ms) increase in activity, which has been localized in a frontoparietal network (McCarthy et al., 1997; Mars et al., 2008; Bekinschtein et al., 2009).”
Toward a computational theory of conscious processing (2013, neutral): “Electro-encephalography and magneto-encephalography confirm that conscious processing causes sustained brain activity, often extending for several hundreds of milliseconds [29,84,85,101,102].”
A Neuronal Model of Predictive Coding Accounting for the Mismatch Negativity (2012, methodology): “For example, Bekinschtein et al. (2009) showed that, when participants are presented with the repetition of a five-tone sequence AAAAB, the final B sound continues to elicit a MMN even though the occurrence of this sound is perfectly predictable based on the prior occurrence of four A sounds.”
From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness (2011, methodology): “Others have adapted this methodology asking patients to count the number of deviant trials in an auditory oddball series [64] (two out of three MCS, one LIS, but none of the four studied vegetative/unresponsive patients could do the task).”
Recovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients (2012, neutral): “…conscious states at the individual level with the diagnostic capacity of other neurophysiological methods, such as peripherally evoked potentials (Kotchoubey et al., 2005; Bekinschtein et al., 2009; Fischer et al., 2010; Boly et al., 2011) and long-term EEG recordings (Landsness et al., 2011).”
Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. (2011, background): “…et al., 2008) and mismatch negativities (MMN), i.e., electrophysiological responses that arise primarily from the temporal lobe in response to rare, deviant, or otherwise unpredictable auditory stimuli (Allen et al., 2000; Bekinschtein et al., 2009a; Diekhof et al., 2009; Nä a ¨ tä nen, 1990).”
A Hierarchy of Responses to Auditory Regularities in the Macaque Brain (2014, neutral): “We excluded global standard trials that immediately followed a global deviant trial (Bekinschtein et al., 2009).”
Neural mechanisms of time-forward predictions for naturalistic auditory tone sequences (2026, unknown): “6,10,40.”
The neural activity of auditory conscious perception (2025, unknown): “…to show activity during anesthesia to many stimuli, its processing is not unimpaired: anesthesia greatly disrupts the cortical signals associated with processing hierarchical auditory information, as shown through a local-global oddball paradigm (Bekinschtein et al., 2009; Uhrig et al., 2016).”