4. Grammaticality Judgment Tests and the Measurement of Implicit and Explicit L2 Knowledge
By S. Loewen. 2009
95 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/80d509a6e3e6ddfec82f5ef6f14244d330aefc77
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENT TESTS AS MEASURES OF IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE (2013, methodology): “In one of the most complete studies to date to explore the differential effects of time pressure and task stimulus in GJTs, Loewen ( 2009 ) examined the performance of native and L2 English speakers on a timed and an untimed GJT. 4 He found that both the native and the L2 groups judged the…”
- A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research (2020, background): “Loewen and Erlam (2006), for example, calculated the median time required by native speakers to respond to each item in their study.”
- TIMED AND UNTIMED GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENTS MEASURE DISTINCT TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE (2015, methodology): “The GJTs consisted of 68 English sentences adapted from Loewen ( 2009 ) and R. Ellis (2005), which involved 17 different linguistic structures with two grammatical and two ungrammatical sentences per structure (see the Appendix).”