Concurrent and incremental validity of three trait emotional intelligence measures

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Relationship between emotional intelligence and aggression: a systematic review (2014, background): “Gardner and Qualter (2010) examined the validity, both concurrent and incremental, of three EI instruments for various criterion variables, including physical and verbal aggression.”
Trait emotional intelligence profiles of students from different university faculties (2010, unknown): “…trait EI effects over various relevant variables (e.g., Austin, Saklofske, & Mastoras, 2010; Downey, Johnston, Hansen, Birney, & Stough, 2010; Gardner & Qualter, 2010; Hogan et al., 2010; Johnson, Batey, & Holdsworth, 2009; Kluemper, 2008; Mavroveli, Petrides, Sangareau, & Furnham, 2009;…”
Why are people high in emotional intelligence happier? They make the most of their positive emotions (2017, background): “…validity of trait EI in predicting SWB, beyond demographics and the Big Five personality traits, indicating the unique contribution of trait EI in explaining people's experience of the quality of life (e.g., Andrei et al., 2016; Gardner & Qualter, 2010; Petrides, Pérez-González, & Furnham, 2007).”
Ability and Trait Emotional Intelligence (2013, background): “Indeed, every study that has compared the TEIQue to other EI questionnaires has concluded that it has superior predictive validity and superior psychometric properties more generally (Freudenthaler, Neubauer, Gabler, & Scherl, 2008 ; Gardner & Qualter, 2010 ; Martins et al., 2010 ).”