How Europe's Economies Learn: Coordinating Competing Models
By Edward N. Lorenz, B. Lundvall. 2006
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fe37f0af7f2d3c94f64b4e779cd2cd5c5fa204b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Arne Isaksen
- Franz Tödtling
- Jerker Moodysson
- B. Albashiti
- Henrik Kock
- Michaela Trippl
- James Karlsen
- M. Aboramadan
Citations in the corpus
- Constructing Regional Advantage: Towards State-of-the-Art Regional Innovation System Policies in Europe? (2011, background): “Such a broad-based innovation policy is in line with the innovation system perspective of defining innovation as interactive learning combining a science, technology, innovation and a doing, using, interacting mode of innovation (Lorenz & Lundvall, 2006).”
- Competence development in the workplace: concepts, strategies and effects (2008, result): “This standpoint is not only an outflow of policy discussions about knowledge or learning economies, but has also received considerable support from research (e.g. Lorenz & Lundvall, 2006).”
- Different Modes of Innovation and the Challenge of Connecting Universities and Industry: Case Studies of Two Regional Industries in Norway (2010, background): “The two modes of innovation are the science, technology, innovation (STI) and the doing, using, interacting (DUI) modes (Coenen & Asheim, 2006; Lorenz & Lundvall, 2006).”
- Organizational culture, innovation and performance: a study from a non-western context (2019, methodology): “According to this classification, innovation can be classified as: “Science, Technology and Innovation” (STI) that is based on analytical knowledge and “Doing, Using, and Interaction” that is subject to knowledge retrieved from the engineering field (Coenen and Asheim, 2006; Lorenz and Lundvall, 200”