Rejected, shackled, and alone: The impact of systemic restricted choice on minority consumers’ construction of self.

By Sterling A. Bone, Glenn L. Christensen, Jerome D. Williams. 2014

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fab5266253c0d49b5093688be7e7f299e091626

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. D. Thompson
2. Rebecca W. Hamilton
3. Vladas Griskevicius

In Social Psychology

1. D. Thompson
2. Vladas Griskevicius
3. Rebecca W. Hamilton

In Sociology and Political Science

1. D. Thompson
2. Vladas Griskevicius
3. Rebecca W. Hamilton
4. Anuj K. Shah

Citations in the corpus

• How Financial Constraints Influence Consumer Behavior: An Integrative Framework (2018, background): “Some research suggests that the intersectionality of multiple risk factors (e.g., low income, race, gender) can be experienced as particularly aversive by consumers (Bone et al., 2014).”
• Consumers and Artificial Intelligence: An Experiential Perspective (2020, unknown): “This can occur, for example, when minorities whose financial choices are systemically restricted then frame the self as “fettered, alone, discriminated, and subservient” and experience reductions in self-esteem and self-efficacy (Bone, Christensen, and Williams 2014).”