Conservation of hippocampal memory function in rats and humans

By M. Bunsey, Howard Eichenbaum. 1996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Computational principles of learning in the neocortex and hippocampus (2000, methodology): “Specifically, we showed that the transitivity studies of Bunsey and Eichenbaum (1996) and Dusek and Eichenbaum (1997) can be simulated using the same model as in all of the previous examples, with pattern completion playing a key role.”
The medial temporal lobe. (2004, background): “It is also true that selective hippocampal lesions impair nonspatial memory in rodents (Bunsey & Eichenbaum 1996), monkeys (Doré et al. 1998), and humans (Squire et al. 2001, Levy et al. 2003).”
A computational theory of hippocampal function, and empirical tests of the theory. (2006, background): “This conclusion is supported by the fact that (large or total) hippocampal lesions do not impair the following types of association including odor–odor (Bunsey and Eichenbaum, 1996; Li et al., 1999), odor–reward (Wood et al.”
The hippocampus and memory: insights from spatial processing (2008, background): “In rodents, simple stimulus-reward association learning is resistant to hippocampal damage, but the information that is learnt is relatively inflexibl”
Hippocampal Binding of Novel Information with Dominant Memory Traces Can Support Both Memory Stability and Change (2014, background): “Critically, this activity did not merely reflect associative novelty detection (Kumaran and Maguire, 2009) because it was predictive of subsequent memory and therefore reflected ANB rather than mere detection (Bunsey and Eichenbaum, 1996; Honey et al., 1998).”
Theta rhythm of navigation: Link between path integration and landmark navigation, episodic and semantic memory (2005, background): “Bunsey and Eichenbaum (1996) designed behavioral experiments, in which the rat had to memorize the relations between spatial or nonspatial stimuli and found that animals with hippocampal damage were consistently inferior in solving such tasks.”
Flexible Memories: Differential Roles for Medial Temporal Lobe and Prefrontal Cortex in Cross-Episode Binding (2010, background): “Animal lesion studies have revealed a critical role for the MTL and PFC in mnemonic flexibility (Bunsey and Eichenbaum, 1996; Dusek and Eichenbaum, 1997; DeVito et al., 2010a,b), but it is unknown whether MTL and PFC contribute to cross-episode binding by the same or different mechanisms.”
Prefrontal Cortex Networks Shift from External to Internal Modes during Learning (2016, methodology): “…our task is in line with the idea that the HPC may not be required for simple within-domain (i.e., object–object) associations (Murray et al., 1993; Bunsey and Eichenbaum, 1996), unless there is a requirement to link items with a spatial location (Wirth et al., 2003; Buffalo, 2015) or other…”
Hippocampal contribution to the novel use of relational information in declarative memory (2004, methodology): “Animal studies indicate a role for the hippocampus in the flexible expression of declarative memories (Bunsey and Eichenbaum, 1996; Dusek and Eichenbaum, 1997; Honey et al., 1998).”
Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory? (2009, background): “…within the MTL have been of particular interest to episodic memory researchers because of extensive animal (Brasted, Bussey, Murray, & Wise, 2003; Bunsey & Eichenbaum, 1996) and patient (Gold, Smith, et al., 2006; Hannula, Tranel, & Cohen, 2006; Kroll, Knight, Metcalfe, Wolf, & Tulving, 1996;…”
Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus (2004, background): “Other studies of recollection in humans and hippocampal-dependent memory in animals have emphasized the importance of memory for associations between item”
The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. (2002, background): “…explicit memory (Eichen-left hippocampus more involved in context-dependent baum, 1999), but also favors flexible uses of memory andepisodic or autobiographical memory. relational learning (e.g., performing transitive inference; Bunsey and Eichenbaum, 1996; Dusek and Eichenbaum,Background 1997).”
Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations, and the hippocampus. I. An empirical analysis (2003, result): “Eichenbaum and colleagues have provided several interesting experimental results that are consistent with this characterization (Bunsey and Eichenbaum, 1996; Dusek and Eichenbaum, 1997).”