Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus

By N. Fortin, S. Wright, Howard Eichenbaum. 2004

455 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Hippocampal replay in the awake state: a potential physiological substrate of memory consolidation and retrieval (2011, background): “Lesions of the hippocampus lead to severe deficits in the retrieval of recently stored associations, suggesting that the hippocampus plays a fundamental role in memory retrieval for at least a period of time after the experienc”
Functional neuroanatomy of remote episodic, semantic and spatial memory: a unified account based on multiple trace theory (2005, background): “…with evidence on anterograde memory showing that recollection, an index of experiential factors, is a determinant of hippocampal involvement in memory (Aggleton & Brown, 1999; Eldridge et al. 2000; D. Moscovitch & McAndrews, 2000; Holdstock et al. 2002a; Fortin et al. 2004; Ranganath et al. 2004).”
Hippocampal “time cells” bridge the gap in memory for discontiguous events (2011, unknown): “Considerable data indicate that the hippocampus is critical to episodic memory in humans (Vargha- Khadem et al., 1997; Steinvorth et al., 2005) and animals (Fortin et al., 2004; Ergorul and Eichenbaum, 2004; Day et al., 2003).”
The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory. (2006, methodology): “Previous work with rats suggested that the ROC might be linear after a long retention interval (Fortin et al., 2004).”
Separating the Brain Regions Involved in Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory (2005, background): “Moreover, a variety of human patient and animal lesion studies have indicated that the hippocampus is not necessary for familiarity-based recognition judgments (Eichenbaum et al., 1994; Aggleton and Brown, 1999; Yonelinas et al., 2002; Fortin et al., 2004) (but see Manns et al.”
Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. (2007, background): “However, Fortin et al. also weakened the memories of control rats by introducing a long (70 min) retention interval, which resulted in a low level of recognition performance that was similar to that of the hippocampal rats. Even so, the ROC produced following a long retention interval was not symmet”
The organization of recent and remote memories (2005, background): “Resolution of this debate depends on finding ways to distinguish episodic versus semantic components of memories in animal model”
The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. (2007, methodology): “…0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Figure 4 Measures of recollection and familiarity in amnesic patients with expected hippocampal damage (Yonelinas et al. 2002) and in rats with selective hippocampal lesions (Fortin et al. 2004).”
Dissociating the past from the present in the activity of place cells (2006, background): “Another growing approach is to allow the possibility of memory recall, rather than recognition, and its detection (Steele and Morris, 1999; Day et al., 2003; Fortin et al., 2004) using tests sometimes developed from the human literature (Yonelinas, 2001).”
Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective (2007, unknown): “A number of studies that used the high-threshold/signal-detection model to interpret ROC data have concluded that hippocampal lesions selectively impair recollectio”
The Episodic Memory System: Neurocircuitry and Disorders (2009, unknown): “…in rodents recognition memory is supported by a combination of familiarity for previously experienced stimuli and recollection of specific episodes involving those stimuli, and the recollective component of recognition memory depends on the hippocampus (Fortin et al, 2004; Sauvage et al, 2008).”
Temporal encoding of place sequences by hippocampal cell assemblies. (2006, background): “Finally, in learning, forward serial associations are stronger than backward associations (Tulving, 1969; Kahana, 1996; Fortin et al., 2004; Howard et al., 2005).”