Flexible Memories: Differential Roles for Medial Temporal Lobe and Prefrontal Cortex in Cross-Episode Binding
By Dagmar Zeithamova, Alison R. Preston. 2010
216 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Episodic memory is characterized by rapid formation of new associations that bind information within individual episodes. A powerful aspect of episodic memory is the ability to flexibly apply and recombine information from past experience to guide new behavior. A critical question for memory research is how medial temporal lobe (MTL) and prefrontal cortex (PFC), regions implicated in rapid within-episode binding, further support cross-episode binding in service of mnemonic flexibility. We set to answer this question using an associative inference task in humans that required rapid binding of information across overlapping experiences (AB, BC) to enable successful transfer to novel test probes (AC). Within regions predicting subsequent associative memory for directly learned associations, encoding activation in MTL, including hippocampus and parahippocampal cortex, uniquely predicted success on novel transfer trials both within and across participants, consistent with an integrative encoding mechanism where overlapping experiences are linked into a combined representation during learning. In contrast, during retrieval, PFC activation predicted trial-by-trial transfer success while MTL predicted transfer performance across participants. Moreover, increased MTL-PFC coupling was observed during novel transfer trials compared with retrieval of directly learned associations. These findings suggest that inferential processes support transfer of rapidly acquired experiences to novel events during retrieval where multiple memories are recalled and flexibly recombined in service of successful behavior. Together, these results demonstrate distinct encoding and retrieval mechanisms that support mnemonic flexibility, revealing a unique role for MTL regions in cross-episode binding during encoding and engagement of interactive MTL-PFC processes during flexible transfer at test.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Nathaniel D. Daw
- G. E. Wimmer
- Daphna Shohamy
- Dagmar Zeithamova
- Alison R. Preston
- Margaret L. Schlichting
- Joel L. Voss
- Donna J Bridge
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- G. E. Wimmer
- Daphna Shohamy
- Nathaniel D. Daw
- Dagmar Zeithamova
- Margaret L. Schlichting
- Alison R. Preston
- Joel L. Voss
- Donna J Bridge
Citations in the corpus
- The hippocampus and inferential reasoning: building memories to navigate future decisions (2012, background): “Results showing unique hippocampal responses during inferential retrieval (Preston et al., 2004; Zalesak and Heckers, 2009; Zeithamova and Preston, 2010) might reflect the use of such pattern-separated inputs to support performance.”
- Generalization of value in reinforcement learning by humans (2012, methodology): “…using procedures that first embed relations among stimuli and then probe whether later choices reflect relational knowledge (Dusek & Eichenbaum, 1997; Myers et al., 2003; Preston et al., 2004; Greene et al., 2006; Shohamy et al., 2006; Shohamy & Wagner, 2008; Zeithamova & Preston, 2010).”
- Hippocampal Binding of Novel Information with Dominant Memory Traces Can Support Both Memory Stability and Change (2014, background): “Accounts of memory flexibility have considered mainly how transitive, or conjunctive, representations can support future memory flexibility (Shohamy and Wagner, 2008; Zeithamova and Preston, 2010; Zeithamova et al., 2012).”