Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Distributional and Peer‐Induced Fairness in Supply Chain Contract Design (2013, background): “…both theoretically and experimentally, to contribute signiﬁcantly to coordination failures and efﬁciency loss in supply chains, in particular when supply chain members are not fully informed of other members’ fairness concerns (Katok and Pavlov 2013, Katok et al. 2012, Pavlov and Katok 2012).”
The relative impact of attribute, severity, and timing of psychological contract breach on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes (2013, background): “Other research has shown that relational factors, such as fairness and justice, can impact supply chain relationships in meaningful ways (Griffith et al., 2006; Katok and Pavlov, 2013; Liu et al., 2012).”
On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations (2018, unknown): “…& Grimm, 2014), trust and trustworthiness (Özer, Zheng, & Chen, 2011; Özer, Zheng, & Ren, 2014), fairness concerns (Katok, Olsen, & Pavlov, 2014; Katok & Pavlov, 2013) and linkages between intrinsic motivation and job design (De Treville & Antonakis, 2006; Rodríguez, Buyens, Landeghem, &…”