Psychological Indicators of Innovation Adoption: Cross-Classification Based on Need for Cognition and Need for Change
By Stacy L. Wood, Joffre Swait. 2002
223 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e489095c29ed8f7ac7aa2191b0c186c2dafc222
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Barry Schwartz
- John Hulland
- M. Reinders
- Stephen L. Mueller
- Gergana Y. Nenkov
- E. Straub
- Kayhan Tajeddini
- Jos Bartels
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Marketing
- M. Morrin
- Barry Schwartz
- John Hulland
- M. Reinders
- A. Ward
- Gergana Y. Nenkov
- E. Straub
- Kayhan Tajeddini
Citations in the corpus
- A short form of the Maximization Scale: Factor structure, reliability and validity studies (2008, methodology): “We used a short version of the NFC scale (Wood & Swait, 2002), which consists of five reverse-scored items measuring peoples’ tendency to engage in and enjoy thinking in general.”
- Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning (2009, background): “For example, some research suggests that there may be personality traits that predispose certain people to adopt innovations and/or adopt them more quickly than others (Agarwal & Prasad, 1998b; Wood & Swait, 2002).”
- Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research (2011, methodology): “Wood and Swait (2002) measure the underlying bases for innate innovativeness using two subscales reflecting the cognitive and sensory components: need for cognition and need for change.”
- Entrepreneurial characteristics in Switzerland and the UK: A comparative study of techno-entrepreneurs (2009, background): “In recent years, there has been considerable interest and debate about innovativeness (e.g., Goldsmith and Hofacker 1991; Im et al. 2003; Venkatraman and Price 1990; Wood and Swait 2002; Yang 2005).”