Reconceptualizing Validity for Classroom Assessment
By P. Moss. 2005
113 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7e13b97b26d398236cc9109c6bf48bda4963fda9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Education
- Christopher DeLuca
- Danielle LaPointe-McEwan
- Ulemu Luhanga
- S. Brookhart
- Heidi L. Andrade
- Frank Giraldo
- Wayne A. Zientarski
- J. Walsh
Citations in the corpus
- Educational Assessment Knowledge and Skills for Teachers (2011, background): “Several authors have conceptualized more specifically what teachers need to know about validity and reliability for classroom assessment (Moss, 2003; Nitko & Brookhart, 2011, p. 37–42, 66–68; Smith, 2003; Taylor & Nolen, 2005, p. 17–24; Whittington, 1999), in addition to the more conventional validi”
- Teachers’ approaches to classroom assessment: a large-scale survey (2016, background): “This trend has been articulated by others (Brookhart, 2003; Moss, 2003; Parkes, 2007) who have worked to appropriate measurement concepts for use within classroom settings recognizing that some traditional conceptualizations of validity, reliability, and fairness might not work well for teachers and”