Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice

By C. Knief, Nathanaël Delmotte, Samuel Chaffron, M. Stark, G. Innerebner, R. Wassmann, C. von Mering, Julia A. Vorholt. The ISME Journal, 2011

641 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Ecology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7df5f4cec9864a2bfdff7d8a9e84a475f42c6578

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. (2013, methodology): “, 2011) and the phyllosphere plus rhizosphere microbiomes of rice (Knief et al., 2011).”
Forest tree genomics: 10 achievements from the past 10 years and future prospects (2016, background): “Such functional approaches are still rare for microbial communities associated to plants and soils (Knief et al. 2012; Damon et al. 2012), and”
Taxonomical and functional microbial community selection in soybean rhizosphere (2014, background): “These studies included among others Arabidopsis (Bulgarelli et al., 2012; Lundberg et al., 2012), rice (Knief et al., 2011), oak (Uroz et al., 2010), norway spuce (Calvaruso et al., 2009), wild oats (DeAngelis et al., 2008), potato (Rasch et al., 2006), tobacco (Robin et al., 2006) and soybean (Xu…”
Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice (2015, methodology): “Metagenomic and proteomic approaches have been used to identify different microbial genes present in the rice microbiome (17, 18), but an extensive characterization of microbiome composition and variation has not been performed.”
An evolutionary ecology perspective to address forest pathology challenges of today and tomorrow (2016, background): “Future studies working toward this aim will benefit from the development of functional metagenomics (Knief et al. 2012), microbial interactions modeling (Faust and Raes 2012), as well as evolutionary platforms predicting the outcomes of multispecies interactions (Fortuna et al.”
The microbial ecology of flowers: an emerging frontier in phyllosphere research1 (2014, background): “For phyllosphere microbial communities, decreasing DNA sequencing costs have led to recent strides in describing the microbial composition and diversity for several plant species (e.g., Delmotte et al. 2009; Knief et al. 2012; Ottesen et al. 2013; Redford et al. 2010).”
Phyllospheric Microbiomes: Diversity, Ecological Significance, and Biotechnological Applications (2020, background): “Phyllospheric microbes are often rich in methylotrophic bacteria and can utilize the plant-emitted C1 compounds such as methanol, formaldehyde, and chloromethane (Knief et al. 2012; Jo et al. 2015).”
The Plant Microbiota: Systems-Level Insights and Perspectives. (2016, background): “For root or rhizosphere communities, genes relating to chemotaxis and motility have been identified as enriched categories in the metagenomes of the respective microbiota of wheat and cucumber (88) and grapevine (157) as well as in the metaproteome of rice (64).”
The plant microbiome (2013, background): “The decomposition of pectin releases methanol [10], which can be used as a carbon source by other microbes, and active metabolism of methanol in the rhizosphere has been observed [48].”