An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands

By T. Kroeger, F. Casey. 2007

290 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d900020626db6a4c5921d9588a886da1a6b7959

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Ecosystem Services Provided by Birds (2008, background): “Additional sources include: Turner et al. (2003), Barbier (2007), Boyd (2007), Croitoru (2007), Kroeger and Casey (2007), and references therein.”
Valuation of ecosystem services from rural landscapes using agricultural land prices (2011, unknown): “Partly adapted from Kroeger and Casey (2007).”
In markets we trust? Setting the boundaries of Market-Based Instruments in ecosystem services governance (2015, background): “Even so, the situations in which the market element can increase cost-effectiveness depends entirely on the specific conditions at stake, such as the feasibility of accurate measurement (Salzman and Ruhl, 2000; Kroeger and Casey, 2007) and possibility to keep transaction costs low (Vatn, 2010; Murad”
Improving the link between payments and the provision of ecosystem services in agri-environment schemes (2014, unknown): “Second, a wide range of techniques has been developed in recent years to value ecosystem services, broadly based on the benefits perceived by those consuming them, rather than the costs of provision (Kroeger and Casey, 2007; Glenk et al. this issue).”
Market instruments, ecosystem services, and property rights: Assumptions and conditions for sustained social and ecological benefits (2013, background): “management actions sufficiently to secure the target ecosystem service (Kroeger and Casey, 2007).”
Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits (2007, background): “In practice, many of these services are difficult or costly to measure (Kroeger and Casey, 2007-this volume).”
Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services § (2010, background): “Beyond the need for speculative assumptions, the information demand from condition 2 and 3, and the ‘‘lack of low cost measurability and valuation methods currently precludes efficient allocation of many ecosystem services through market-based approaches’’ (Kroeger and Casey, 2007, p. 321).”
The Handbook of Neoliberalism (2016, background): “And despite arguments that market approaches are a more cost-efficient approach to environmental policy, researchers raise serious questions about the reality of that claim (Kroeger and Casey 2007; Muradian et al. 2010; Walker et al. 2009).”
Soil “Ecosystem” Services and Natural Capital: Critical Appraisal of Research on Uncertain Ground (2016, background): “In this respect, Kroeger and Casey (2007) consider that in general, the risk is too large for market failure, and they reach the conclusion that “in many cases, some form of well-designed government involvement will be required to seek outcomes that protect the public interest.””
A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration (2016, background): “…condition goals are driven by the economy, e. . private returns from trading private and public goods (Stafford Smith, 1994; Kwansoo et al., 2001; Kroeger and Casey, 2007; Stafford Smith et al., 2007) The ability to import otherwise limited resources such as fertilizers, or export sustainability…”