Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services §

By J. Spangenberg, Josef Settele. 2010

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9874ec392321dd15e181b72d64ae74075f049a99

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective (2014, background): “Nevertheless, although monetary valuation can provide useul information about changes to welfare that will result from cosystem management actions, valuation techniques have limiations that are still unresolved (de Groot et al., 2012; Howarth nd Farber, 2002; Spangenberg and Settele, 2010).”
A Vision for Human Well-Being: Transition to Social Sustainability (2012, positive): “For example, the use of taxes and payments for ecosystem services could internalize the environmental externalities of economic activities [126,127], but in addition redistribution payment schemes to transfer the receipts from taxes to the poor should also be designed in parallel.”
Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons (2011, neutral): “2010; Spangenberg & Settele 2010).”
Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets (2012, background): “for non-marketed goods and services (Ludwig, 2000; Spangenberg and Settele, 2010).”
Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework (2017, background): “The most appropriate classification system should be chosen based on its fit-for-purpose (Heink et al., 2015; Spangenberg and Settele, 2010), i.e. whether the ecosystem service analysis intends to focus more on ecological systems (e.g. considering impacts on and pressures from the socio-economic…”
Factors and processes affecting plant biodiversity in permanent grasslands. A review (2011, neutral): “Finally, a positive effect of liming on Shannon’s diversity, evenness (van der Wal et al. 2009), and species richness (Schellberg et al. 1999; Spiegelberger et al. 2006) in grasslands has been demonstrated.”
Classifying Ecosystem Services for Economic Valuation: The case of forest water services (2010, background): “Also, there is still a great deal of confusion amongst decision-makers and academics from all disciplines about the validity and implications of ecosystem service valuation (Spangenberg and Settele, 2010; Turner et al., 2010).”
Ecosystem services (2011, neutral): “For example, Spangenberg and Settele (2010) question the assumptions on which current monetary methodologies are based, and Go´mez-Baggethun et al. (2010; see also Go´mez-Baggethun and Ruiz Pe´rez, 2011) look at the ideological issues that attend recent trends to commodity nature.”