Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: a prosodic approach

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: evidence from event-related brain potentials (2009, background): “…allow us to control-for/eliminate problematic confounds arising in natural language studies, and even in miniature versions of them (e.g. certain problems in morphosyntax have been shown to arise as a result of phonological/prosodic problems, see Goad and White, 2004; 2006; Mueller, 2006).”
Morphological Congruency and the Acquisition of L2 Morphemes (2011, background): “In another study, Guillelmon and Grosjean (2001) adopted a shadowing task to examine the sensitivity to French gender agreement among English learners of French.”
Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition (2009, background): “…– features – that are currently available to us from 10 See, for example, Prévost and White (2000); Goad et al. (2003); Montrul and Slabakova (2003); Archibald (2004); White et al. (2004); Hopp (2005); Goad and White (2006); Grüter (2006); Lardiere (2007); Valenzuela (2008), amongst others.”
Morphological Structure in Native and Nonnative Language Processing (2010, background): “…of certain inflectional morphemes has led some researchers to hypothesize that this might reflect a production-specific " mapping " problem rather than a competence deficit (e.g., Prévost & White, 2000), possibly due to prosodic constraints operative in the learners' L1 (Goad & White, 2006).”