Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition

By Donna Lardiere. 2009

550 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e647d6942d85a47b0aeb4b715788296aa2ee10a3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. S. Hwang
2. Roumyana Slabakova
3. Donna Lardiere

In Language and Linguistics

1. S. Hwang
2. Roumyana Slabakova
3. Donna Lardiere
4. S. Montrul
5. Alejandro Cuza

Citations in the corpus

• The scalpel model of third language acquisition (2017, background): “The scalpel model makes essentially the same predictions that are made for additional language acquisition by the feature reassembly hypothesis (Lardiere, 2009; Slabakova, 2009) and the bottleneck hypothesis (Slabakova, 2008).”
• Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach (2013, methodology): “However, Chierchia’s claim has been contradicted by the findings of several subsequent studies (many of which are cited in Lardiere, 2009).”
• Aperiodic Dynamics of Cell Assemblies Recruited for L1 and L2 Processing of French Wh-Dependencies Highlight a Temporo-Parietal Engagement in Syntax (2026, unknown): “Cognitively, L2 acquisition as implicit learning involves the (re)assembly of syntax-semantics (syn-sem) features into feature sets for basic novel lexico-grammatical elements [13–15] engaging with syntactic computations.”