Introduction to Behavioral Addictions

By J. Grant, Marc N. Potenza, Aviv Weinstein, D. Gorelick. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 2010

1,209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background: Several behaviors, besides psychoactive substance ingestion, produce short-term reward that may engender persistent behavior, despite knowledge of adverse consequences, i.e., diminished control over the behavior. These disorders have historically been conceptualized in several ways. One view posits these disorders as lying along an impulsive-compulsive spectrum, with some classified as impulse control disorders. An alternate, but not mutually exclusive, conceptualization considers the disorders as non-substance or “behavioral” addictions. Objectives: Inform the discussion on the relationship between psychoactive substance and behavioral addictions. Methods: We review data illustrating similarities and differences between impulse control disorders or behavioral addictions and substance addictions. This topic is particularly relevant to the optimal classification of these disorders in the forthcoming fifth edition of the American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V). Results: Growing evidence suggests that behavioral addictions resemble substance addictions in many domains, including natural history, phenomenology, tolerance, comorbidity, overlapping genetic contribution, neurobiological mechanisms, and response to treatment, supporting the DSM-V Task Force proposed new category of Addiction and Related Disorders encompassing both substance use disorders and non-substance addictions. Current data suggest that this combined category may be appropriate for pathological gambling and a few other better studied behavioral addictions, e.g., Internet addiction. There is currently insufficient data to justify any classification of other proposed behavioral addictions. Conclusions and Scientific Significance: Proper categorization of behavioral addictions or impulse control disorders has substantial implications for the development of improved prevention and treatment strategies.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7cdb6c5e8cf13caf0303c94bd6ce08a95deddc8f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

  1. Matthias Brand
  2. Daria J. Kuss
  3. Mark D. Griffiths
  4. Klaus Wölfling
  5. Christian Laier
  6. Kimberly S. Young
  7. Christine Altstötter-Gleich
  8. Mirko Pawlikowski

In Clinical Psychology

  1. Mark D. Griffiths
  2. Daria J. Kuss
  3. Zsolt Demetrovics
  4. Kağan Kırcaburun
  5. Joël Billieux
  6. Matthias Brand
  7. Klaus Wölfling
  8. Kimberly S. Young

In Epidemiology

  1. Daria J. Kuss
  2. Zsolt Demetrovics
  3. Kağan Kırcaburun
  4. Cecilie Schou Andreassen
  5. Matthias Brand
  6. Mark D. Griffiths
  7. Joël Billieux
  8. Klaus Wölfling

Citations in the corpus