Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
By D. Turk, R. Dworkin, Robert R. Allen, N. Bellamy, N. Brandenburg, D. Carr, C. Cleeland, R. Dionne, John T. Farrar, B. Galer and 17 more. Pain, 2003
1,231 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Oncology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7bfb7dea2e8abf39744542c3ed18498ad69fe807
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Oncology
In Psychiatry and Mental health
In Sociology and Political Science
- Mike Clarke
- Douglas G. Altman
- Jane M. Blazeby
- Elizabeth Gargon
- Paula R. Williamson
- David Moher
- K. F. Schulz
Citations in the corpus
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012, background): “More than 50 other groups have been working on COS in specific areas of health care, including pain [14], maternity care [15] and some pediatric specialties [16].”
- Acceptance‐based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2011, neutral): “The cognitive-behavioural perspective introduced in 1983 [59] emphasized the role of attributions, efficacy expectations, personal control, and problem solving.”
- The Tinnitus Functional Index: Development of a New Clinical Measure for Chronic, Intrusive Tinnitus (2012, background): “The potential benefits to be derived from developing a “core set” of measures have been emphasized for tinnitus research and clinical practice (Axelsson 1992; Meikle & Griest 2002) as well as in many other health contexts (Tugwell & Boers 1993; van der Heijde et al. 1997; Cox et al. 2000; Turk et al”