John T. Farrar

Pain · 2000–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 10 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom John T. Farrar trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Paul R. Rosenbaum

Who trusts John T. Farrar overall

1. A. Louw
2. R. Dworkin
3. D. Turk
4. M. Haefeli
5. Sebastian Schneeweiss
6. S. Seaman

Papers from John T. Farrar's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers John T. Farrar trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (Annals of Internal Medicine)
2. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11‐point numerical pain rating scale (Pain)
3. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. (Mayo Clinic proceedings)
4. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation (Quality of Life Research)
5. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 3rd ed.
6. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (Clinical Oral Investigations)
7. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (Annals of Internal Medicine)
8. Advances in neuropathic pain: diagnosis, mechanisms, and treatment recommendations. (Archives of Neurology)
9. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
10. The epidemiology of chronic pain of predominantly neuropathic origin. Results from a general population survey. (Journal of Pain)

Their papers

• The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials (2012) — 1,824 citations
• Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. (2003) — 855 citations
• Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003) — 4,126 citations
• Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003) — 1,231 citations
• Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short‐form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF‐MPQ‐2) (2009) — 698 citations
• Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. (2008) — 3,237 citations
• Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: Evidence‐based recommendations (2007) — 2,107 citations
• Advances in neuropathic pain: diagnosis, mechanisms, and treatment recommendations. (2003) — 1,295 citations
• Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11‐point numerical pain rating scale (2001) — 5,521 citations
• Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures (2000) — 1,074 citations