Construct validation in organizational behavior research.

By J. Edwards. 2003

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7afb4dfaf93cb0664c6f45c0c31e53aae71a1bd3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Fallacy of Formative Measurement (2011, result): “This aspect of construct validity relies on the judgment of the researcher to evaluate the extent to which measures can be interpreted in a manner consistent with the meaning of the construct (Cronbach & Meehl, 1955; Edwards, 2003; Schwab, 1980).”
VIRTUE-BASED MEASUREMENT OF ETHICAL LEADERSHIP: THE LEADERSHIP VIRTUES QUESTIONNAIRE (2010, methodology): “Again, we conducted another phase of exploratory factor analysis (principal axis and direct oblimin) (Fabrigar et al., 1999). According to the suggestion of Montanelli and Humphreys (1976), we found that there is a steep break in the eigenvalue plot between the first and second factor (eigenvalues o”
New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology‐mediated customer service experience (2004, background): “While there is still some debate over the relative merits of multidimensional constructs in management research, some critics contend that they are “conceptually ambiguous” ( Edwards, 2001 ) and should therefore be avoided whenever possible.”
An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity (2020, background): “To address this issue, the use of disattenuated or error-corrected correlations where the effect of unreliability is removed is often recommended (Edwards, 2003; J. A. Shaffer et al., 2016): r12 1⁄4 rXY ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi rXrY p ð4Þ”
Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011, background): “When measures have low reliability and/or low construct validity (Edwards, 2003), the quality of the data analysis really becomes a moot point because measurement quality (“garbage in—garbage out”) necessarily sets an upper limit on the meaningfulness of substantive findings, irrespective of the qua”
Enhancing Rigor in Quantitative Entrepreneurship Research (2019, background): “…validity, authors should provide clear construct definitions, demonstrate that the study’s empirical indicators reflect their underlying constructs (Edwards, 2003), and ideally, report sufficient tests so that reviewers and readers can independently assess the construct validity (Aguinis et al.,…”
Self-Esteem Within the Work and Organizational Context: A Review of the Organization-Based Self-Esteem Literature (2004, background): “According to Edwards (2003), “Construct validity does not refer to the inherent properties of a measure or instrument.”
The Development and Validation of a New Machiavellianism Scale (2009, unknown): “We noted previously that we selected a latent variable structure instead of an aggregate variable structure because we anticipated the dimensions of Mach to be highly interrelated and to share similar relationships with antecedents and consequences (Edwards, 2003; MacKenzie et al., 2005).”
Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus : the subjective experience of the past, present, and future (2009, methodology): “We demonstrate support for the TFS through a series of construct validation studies (Edwards, 2003), with confirmatory factor analyses (Studies 1 and 2); assessment of nomological validity (Study 2), convergent, and discriminant validity (Studies 2 and 3); and assessment of temporal stability and pr”