Institutional coherence and macroeconomic performance

By L. Kenworthy. 2006

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7af34ca4433c90f08930575a5eee6b3d278af7f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Finance

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe (2009, unknown): “Still, we agree with Kenworthy (2006, 86) that aggregate analyses, e.g., based on GDP data, have limited merits in testing causal hypotheses on economic performance.”
Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research (2018, unknown): “Most of the works on these topics so far have drawn on the Varieties of Capitalism framework and, in doing so, have adopted the underlying logic of complementarity residing in coherent strategic or market coordination across institutional dimensions (e.g. Hall and Soskice, 2001; Taylor, 2004; Kenwor”
Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business (2008, unknown): “While similar to Hall and Soskice in its emphasis on the importance of institutional configurations and complementarities, this approach includes more sociological variables, and discusses the internal make-up of firms (see also Redding, 2005), such as ownership control and sectoral vs intersectoral”
From comparing capitalisms to the politics of institutional change (2008, background): “…that macroeconomic performance is positively correlated with the degree of internal coherence around either market or strategic coordination: but Kenworthy (2006) finds no correlation, indicating that the research may lack robustness with regard to the time periods and classifications of…”
Asset Specificity, Institutional Complementarities and the Variety of Skill Regimes in Coordinated Market Economies (2009, background): “Kenworthy (2006), challenging the findings of Hall and Gingerich (2004), finds no strong relationship between institutional coherence and macro-economic performance on the country level.”
Sino-Capitalism: China's Reemergence and the International Political Economy (2012, unknown): “35 Kenworthy 2006.”
E Pluribus Unum? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism (2010, unknown): “Furthermore, several studies find no empirical support for the claim of the economic superiority of “pure” cases (see, for example, Kenworthy 2006).”
The Varieties of Capitalism and Hybrid Success (2007, background): “Some have even suggested that hybrid forms may have their own unique dynamics that can produce socioeconomic performance that is just as good as LMEs and CMEs (e.g., Crouch, 2005; Kenworthy, 2006).”
Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety (2007, background): “In a similarly structured analysis, Kenworthy (2006) finds no correlation may lack robustness with regard to the time periods and classifications of countries.”
From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power (2014, background): “While this proposition is intuitively appealing, empirical studies of the links between societal institutions and economic and technological outcomes are often inconclusive (Akkermans, Castaldi, & Los, 2009; Herrmann, 2008; Kenworthy, 2006; Kogut & Ragin, 2006; Taylor, 2004).”