Sino-Capitalism: China's Reemergence and the International Political Economy

By Christopher A. Mcnally. 2012

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e43016bb4e1b32dead296e45168eb964c9f6f24

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Ilias Alami
2. Frank W. Takes
3. Xin Zhang
4. Eelke M. Heemskerk
5. Adam D. Dixon
6. Matthew D. Stephen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ilias Alami
2. Frank W. Takes
3. Xin Zhang
4. Eelke M. Heemskerk
5. Adam D. Dixon
6. Matthew D. Stephen

In Strategy and Management

1. Ilias Alami
2. Frank W. Takes
3. Xin Zhang
4. Eelke M. Heemskerk
5. Adam D. Dixon
6. Matthew D. Stephen

Citations in the corpus

• State capitalism(s) redux? Theories, tensions, controversies (2020, background): “…late developers’ are not coherently directed by a central planning body, and they use sophisticated policies not simply to shield themselves from global competition in a protectionist fashion but to improve their relative position in the world economy (McNally, 2012: 755; N€olke, 2014: 89).”
• Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge (2014, background): “And domestically, ‘Sino-capitalism’ has been characterized by the prominence of interpersonal relationships over legal codes, and of a strong state over market-driven development (McNally, 2012: 749–756; see also Breslin, 2013; Ten Brink, 2011: 11–16).”
• The Corporate Elite Community Structure of Global Capitalism (2016, background): “This literature is particularly interested in the rise of China (Breslin 2011, McNally 2012) and in the growing importance of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, Wilson et al .”
• Chinese Capitalism and the Maritime Silk Road: A World-Systems Perspective (2017, background): “Thus, externally, China has not openly challenged the current liberal capitalistic world order yet, even though it has demonstrated ambitions to establish international institutions in accordance to its preference.(53) 324 X.”
• Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies (2015, unknown): “In a way, much of what has been written on Sino-capitalism is not exclusively Chinese, but can be applied generally to this ‘new type’ of state capitalism that ‘contrasts sharply with liberal-democratic forms of capitalism, especially Anglo-American capitalism’ (McNally, 2012: 757).”