Information systems research and Hofstede's culture's consequences: an uneasy and incomplete partnership

By Dianne P. Ford, Catherine E. Connelly, D. Meister. IEEE Trans. Engineering Management, 2003

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance (2006, unknown): “Rather they provide complementary perspectives on the impact of culture on behavior (Ford et al. 2003).”
The effects of national culture values on consumer acceptance of e-commerce: Online shoppers in China (2009, background): “In high UAI cultures, people usually feel threatened by uncertain situations [3].”
Information technology and culture: Identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture (2005, background): “Despite such criticisms, HofstedeÕs impact on management research has been substantial (Sondergaard, 1994), and his cultural dimensions form the conceptual backbone of much cross-cultural management and IS research (Ford et al., 2003).”
The effects of website design on purchase intention in online shopping: the mediating role of trust and the moderating role of culture (2010, result): “" (Ford et al., 2003, p.10) In keeping with the preceding endorsement, in this research Hofstede's framework has been used for this study.”
Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict (2006, background): “More recently, works by Myers and Tan (2002) and by Ford, Connelly, and Meister (2003) provide critical examinations of cross-cultural information systems research and offer suggestions for future IT research examining issues involving national culture and IT.”