Design Research in Information Systems

1,254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Gaining Customer Experience Insights That Matter (2018, methodology): “The suggested solution, development, and evaluation stages were iterative until they offered a reasonable version of the artefact (Vaishnavi and Kuechler 2005).”
A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems (2013, background): “They can, however, give guidance to researchers and represent foundations that can be used for descriptive evaluations on the basis of informed argument by developing convincing arguments for a taxonomy’s utility (Hevner & Chatterjee, 2010, p. 119).”
Transforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots (2019, methodology): “For the development of this novel digital channel for interaction between government and citizens we adopted the ‘design science’ paradigm (Hevner & Chatterjee, 2010; Hevner, March, Park, & Ram, 2004).”
A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research (2007, background): “Work in engineering [2, 14, 16, 38], computer science [37, 46], and IS [1, 10, 20, 31, 33, 40, 55, 56] has sought to collect and disseminate the appropriate reference literature [51]; characterize its purposes;”