Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research
By L. Green, Russell E. Glasgow. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 2006
955 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79e882917fd97fd648ce292d0f71e69da6925ebf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Douglas G. Altman
- David Moher
- P. Gøtzsche
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- J. Tetzlaff
- Russell E. Glasgow
- P. Devereaux
- Mike Clarke
In General Health Professions
- David Moher
- Douglas G. Altman
- Mike Clarke
- J. Tetzlaff
- A. Liberati
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- P. Gøtzsche
- C. Mulrow
Citations in the corpus
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009, background): “standard way to assess applicability simultaneously to different audiences, some systems do exist [153].”
- Can Digital Technology Enhance Social Connectedness Among Older Adults? A Feasibility Study (2019, methodology): “A feasibility study was used because we were testing an unexamined intervention with a population for whom we lack in-depth knowledge, and prioritizing real-life settings and constraints over optimal conditions (Bowen, Kreuter, & Fernandez, 2009; Green & Glasgow, 2006).”
- The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. (2013, result): “concerning their potential for generalization.(3) A recent review of grant proposals assessing the extent to which the RE-AIM framework was fully applied identified similar results in terms of problems with understanding some the definitions of the RE-AIM dimensions and the application of the framew”
- Selecting and Improving Quasi-Experimental Designs in Effectiveness and Implementation Research (2018, background): “which in turn has led to a greater focus on intervention research designs that can be applied in real-world settings (2, 8, 9, 20, 25, 26, 10, 2).”
- A Review of Generalizability and Transportability (2021, background): “…(3) treatment, such as timing, dosage, or staff training; and (4) outcomes, such as length of follow-up or timing of measurements (Cronbach and Shapiro, 1982; Rothwell, 2005; Dekkers et al., 2010; Green and Glasgow, 2006; Burchett, Umoquit and Dobrow, 2011; Attanasio, Meghir and Szekely, 2003).”
- Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. (2009, background): “For these interventions, context, adaptability, and external validity become as important as experimental control, fidelity of implementation, and internal validity (40, 41, 45, 49).”
- Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. (2009, background): “, the translation of science to the various circumstances of practice) (62, 71).”
- A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. (2008, background): “How much and through what mechanisms adaptation should be encouraged is a key area for future implementation research.(35) The extent to which coordination is required across multiple departments or specialties is an important consideration in the success of new interventions.”
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009, background): “In addition, adroit authors consider factors that are important in translating the evidence to different settings and that may modify the estimates of effects reported in the review [153].”
- Belief Systems of Families of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders or Down Syndrome (2009, background): “This article provides practice-relevant knowledge— knowledge with direct applicability to clinical practice (Green & Glasgow, 2006; King, Currie, Smith, Servais, & McDougall, 2008).”
- How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. (2007, methodology): “Measures of cost, implementation, quality of life, and potential adverse or iatrogenic outcomes (such as doing less well on preventive services or diseases not targeted) are especially recommended (26, 33, 49).”