The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time.

By Bridget Gaglio, J. Shoup, Russell E. Glasgow. American Journal of Public Health, 2013

818 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Speech and Hearing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8cc8178ab7844918eec5ece3e606f0833749fb1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. Russell E. Glasgow
2. Bridget Gaglio
3. Paul Estabrooks
4. Taryn Moir

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Russell E. Glasgow

In Speech and Hearing

1. Russell E. Glasgow

Citations in the corpus

• Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs in Implementation Research (2019, background): “A variety of evaluation-oriented implementation frameworks may guide the choices of such measures (e.g., RE-AIM; Gaglio et al., 2013; Glasgow et al., 1999).”
• RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review (2019, background): “The most comprehensive reviews have spanned the literature from 2000 to 2012 or 2015 (10, 42, 52).”