Toward a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: The Saturn Partnership

By Thomas A. Kochan, Saul A. Rubinstein. 2000

444 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/795273670145a2de15038df238fe4c3951501e3c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Public Administration

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Impact of European Works Councils on Management Decision-Making in UK and US-based Multinationals: A Case Study Comparison (2004, background): “Instances of companies in ‘outsider’ systems where such ‘voice’ rights have been voluntarily embedded, such as GM’s Saturn subsidiary, are unusual and the subject of ongoing controversy (Kochan and Rubinstein 2000).”
Towards a Property Rights Foundation for a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm (2005, background): “Employees establish themselves as influential stakeholders who contribute to problem solving, conflict resolution, and quality improvement (Kochan and Rubenstein, 2000).”
Responsible Corporate Governance: Towards a Stakeholder Board of Directors? (2009, unknown): “Key Distinctions Between the Shareholder and Stakeholder Perspective of Corporate Governance (Adapted from Kochan and Rubinstein, 2000 )”
Advancing the Human Capital Perspective on Value Creation by Joining Capabilities and Governance Approaches (2015, background): “Employees in a stakeholder approach have the opportunity to formulate problems, become involved in problem solving and quality enhancement, and resolve disputes (Kochan & Rubinstein, 2000).”
Stakeholder Theory: Reviewing a Theory That Moves Us (2008, background): “Therefore, indirect strategies, such as coalitions formed between stakeholder groups (Kochan & Rubenstein, 2000; Neville & Menguc, 2006; S. G. Scott & Lane, 2000), may allow stakeholders to combine their power and legitimacy in a way that enhances their bargaining position vis-à-vis firms.”