Effects of Peer Coaching on Teachers' Collaborative Interactions and Students' Mathematics Achievement

By S. Murray, Xin Ma, J. Mazur. 2009

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Which Characteristics of a Reciprocal Peer Coaching Context Affect Teacher Learning as Perceived by Teachers and Their Students? (2009, background): “…advocates the provision of adequate resources such as time and scheduling facilities by the school administrators (see gottesman, 2000; Hyman, 1990; Murray et al., 2008), the results of both the quantitative as well as the qualitative analyses of our study indicate that teachers also learn…”
Professional Development in the United States: Trends and Challenges. Phase II of a Three-Phase Study. Technical Report. (2010, background): “…experts who help local educators address needs specific to their students and school improvement goals. researCh on Peer learning By contrast, Murray, Ma, and Mazur (2009) conducted a quasi-experimental matched-sample study of six teachers who participated in a math/science summer institute…”
An Ecological Systems Perspective on Mentoring at Work: A Review and Future Prospects (2011, background): “Studies on peer mentoring in the workplace can benefit from examining the concomitantly growing literature on peer mentoring in academia (eg, Murray, Ma, & Mazur, 2009 ; Sanchez, Bauer, & Paronto, 2006 ).”
The Nature and Predictors of Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching. (2010, background): “Other adults who view instruction - including administrators and math coaches - do not necessarily comment on the mathematics in any depth (Murray et al., 2009).”