Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Performance in Russia: A Longitudinal Study

By Bat Batjargal. 2003

576 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78788b7cd90ff974fbd16a3c96b800543dfe518b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A mediation model between dimensions of social capital (2013, background): “Batjargal (2003) individually analyzed how different aspects of social capital from networks of entrepreneurs affected the performance of firms.”
Performance implications of nonmarket strategy in China (2007, unknown): “Researchers have argued that nonmarket strategy may have a positive effect on firm performance (e.g., Baron, 1997; Batjargal, 2003; Luo, 2003a; Luo & Chen, 1997; Park & Luo, 2001; Peng, 1997, 2003; Peng & Luo, 2000; Peng, Lee, & Tan, 2001; Shaffer, Quasney, & Grimm, 2000; Tsang, 1998; Wu & Leung, ”
Capital is not enough: opportunity entrepreneurship and formal institutions (2018, unknown): “embeddedness (Batjargal, 2003; Cooke & Wills, 1999) and knowledge transfer (Tsai, 2001).”
The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension (2017, unknown): “…Maurer et al. 2011; Pittaway et al. 2004; Tsai and Ghoshal 1998; Zheng 2010) and intellectual capital creation (Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998), (c) the effectiveness of workgroups (Oh et al. 2004), and (d) superior managerial (Moran 2005) and organizational (Acquaah 2007; Batjargal 2003) performance.”
Internet entrepreneurship: Social capital, human capital, and performance of Internet ventures in China (2007, background): “…an effective way of managing hostile environments in transition economies is doing business through personal networks of relationships because network ties provide resources and information, and help to find clients, suppliers, and investors, who are socially bound (Batjargal, 2003, 2005a,c, 2006).”
Institutions and Entrepreneurship Development in Russia: A Comparative Perspective (2008, background): “Batjargal (2003) uses a social embeddedness approach to examine the impact of entrepreneurs' social capital on their firm's performance in Russia.”
Rapid Institutional Shifts and the Co–evolution of Entrepreneurial Firms in Transition Economies (2010, background): “The definitions used in economics for entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial firms do not necessarily match those employed in management and entrepreneurship research (e.g., Batjargal, 2003; Baumol, 2002).”
Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs' social networks, and new venture growth (2013, background): “…holes enable entrepreneurs to obtain permissions, licenses, and quotas and to re-enforce contracts and curb the predatory prerogatives of the government, because these ties serve as bridges to valuable contacts in distant social clusters (Batjargal, 2003a, 2003b; Frye, 2000; Frye & Shleifer, 1997).”
Managerial ties, absorptive capacity, and innovation (2008, background): “Managerial ties—the boundary-spanning ties and interpersonal connections of top managers—have vital influences on a corporation’s activities (Burt, 1992; Uzzi, 1996) and may be a source of competitive advantage (Mizruchi, 1996; Tsang, 1998) and superior performance ( Batjargal, 2003 ; P ark &L uo,20”