L. Holman

Statistics and Probability · with Hauser · 2015–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom L. Holman trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. A. Sutton
  2. John P. A. Ioannidis
  3. Shelley J. Correll
  4. Eugene Garfield
  5. Joseph P. Simmons
  6. Uri Simonsohn
  7. E. Akçay
  8. I. Cleasby
  9. Shinichi Nakagawa
  10. Leif D. Nelson

Who trusts L. Holman overall

  1. Lucía Santamaría
  2. Helena Mihaljević
  3. Michael Fire
  4. Christoph Molnar

Papers from L. Holman's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. Holman trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  2. Data from Paper “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant”
  3. Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (Nature)
  4. The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship (PLoS ONE)
  5. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  6. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  7. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
  8. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (Biological Reviews of The Cambridge Philosophical Society)
  9. Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research
  10. QUASIREPLICATION AND THE CONTRACT OF ERROR: Lessons from Sex Ratios, Heritabilities and Fluctuating Asymmetry

Their papers