Occupational Sex Composition and the Gendered Availability of Workplace Support

By C. Taylor. 2010

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7849a90123a60608010825a55fef53292407bef4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Elise Tak
2. S. Soule
3. E. Horng
4. Susanna Loeb
5. Shelley J. Correll
6. Maria Charles
7. Sarah Thébaud
8. Erin A. Cech

In General Health Professions

1. Susanna Loeb

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Elise Tak
2. Susanna Loeb
3. Shelley J. Correll
4. S. Soule
5. S. Benard
6. Sarah Thébaud
7. Maria Charles
8. Cecilia L. Ridgeway

Citations in the corpus

• Tapping the Principal Pipeline (2011, background): “Being a member of a numerical minority in one’s occupation has been found to be an advantage for men and a disadvantage for women (Taylor, 2010).”
• Gender Inequality in Product Markets: When and How Status Beliefs Transfer to Products (2017, background): “In contrast, there is no consistent evidence of such penalties for men in female-dominated domains (Taylor 2010; Williams 1992).”