Zoe Jordan
Statistics and Probability · 2018–2019
A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 23 citations into it
Whom Zoe Jordan trusts
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Sandy Oliver (in Statistics and Probability)
Papers from Zoe Jordan's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Zoe Jordan trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
- The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. (International Journal of Health Policy and Management)
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (Quality of Life Research)
- Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
- A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. (Health Information and Libraries Journal)
- Assessing Bias in Studies of Prognostic Factors (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
- Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data (International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare)
Their papers
- The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI) (2019) — 870 citations
- What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018) — 972 citations