A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment

By J. Fahy. 2002

338 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/78276b0a9bcb5b055e1f87c75e7de77e737e80fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Development of a multi-criteria approach for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects (2011, methodology): “This approach was utilised in the work of Fahy (2002) on sustainability.”
Internationalization of private firms: environmental turbulence and organizational strategies and resources (2004, background): “2.5 Firm performance No clear and consistent relationship has been detected between a large firm’s propensity to export and ability to report superior firm performance (for a review see Sullivan 1994, Johnson 1995, Fahy 2002).”
Implementing competitive strategies: the role of responsive and proactive market orientations (2010, background): “The RB theory does not place any significant emphasis on firm size because that measure is primarily focused on resource-based rather than monopoly-based advantages ( Fahy, 2002”
The role of intellectual resources, product innovation capability, reputational resources and marketing capability combinations in firm growth (2014, background): “According to Galbreath (2005), these resources possess different value; Conner (1991) and Fahy (2002) suggest that differences in the level of success between firms are contingent to the resource position barriers, or barriers to duplication.”
Furthering export participation in less performing developing countries: The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and managerial capacity factors (2004, background): “The premise is that with the right quality of decision makers, small LPDC firms could be properly led to procure and develop other advantage-creating resources and competencies ( Fahy, 2002”
The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance (2013, methodology): “However, only a few RBV studies (e.g. Fahy, 2002; Galbreath and Galvin, 2008; Schriber, 2015) have examined the relative effects of TR and IR on firm success in the same study and the justification of these studies is compelling particularly for validation of the main prescription of the RBV…”
Relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and performance: Comparing small and medium‐size enterprises (2012, result): “Research has shown that the same strategy can often produce quite different results when applied to similar firms (Davis and Devinney, 1997; Fahy, 2002).”
Resource determinants of strategy and performance: The case of British exporters (2012, background): “These findings provide a new contribution to the argument advanced in prior research that resources (tangible and intangible) and capabilities are two distinct sources of competitive advantage (Hall, 1992; Fahy, 2002; Kaleka, 2002).”