How much does the business group matter in Korea
By Sea-Jin Chang, Jaebum Hong. 2002
254 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77b9a069293888bc04e6b47add5beeaa9f22b99c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Mike W. Peng
- Andrew Delios
- R. Hoskisson
- K. Meyer
- Laszlo Tihanyi
- Vikas Kumar
- P. Kale
- Igor Filatotchev
In Economics and Econometrics
- Mike W. Peng
- Andrew Delios
- R. Hoskisson
- Vikas Kumar
- P. Kale
- Ishtiaq P. Mahmood
- Yishay Yafeh
- Laszlo Tihanyi
In Information Systems
- Mike W. Peng
- Kulwant Singh
- Vikas Kumar
- Yishay Yafeh
- Andrew Delios
- Laszlo Tihanyi
- Tarun Khanna
- R. Hoskisson
Citations in the corpus
- From diversification premium to diversification discount during institutional transitions (2008, background): “Starting with Chang and Choi (1988), several studies document a diversification premium (Chang & Hong, 2000, 2002; Guillen, 2000; Khanna & Rivkin, 2001).”
- Guest Editors' Introduction Strategy Research in Emerging Economies: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom* (2005, unknown): “…which have significant related diversification or vertical integration because of norms for cooperation and interdependence among business groups (Chang and Hong, 2000, 2002) are likely to have a learning advantage over those that have broad diversified operations which are managed in a…”
- Emerging Multinationals, Emerging Theory: Macro- and Micro-Level Perspectives (2010, background): “Tan and Meyer (this issue-b) reframe the argument about business groups (as presented by amongst others Chang and Hong, 2002; Khanna and Yafeh, 2007) by arguing that business groups resemble the multinational corporations of the developed world in the sense that both control substantial resources,…”
- Outside Directors, Ownership Structure and Firm Profitability in Korea (2007, background): “The agency cost of large shareholders in Korean companies is mainly due to such cross-shareholding (Chang and Hong, 2002), which has resulted in the advent of tunnelling (Bae et al ., 2002).”
- The Evolution and Restructuring of Diversified Business Groups in Emerging Markets: The Lessons from Chaebols in Korea (2004, background): “By successfully transforming from exporters of cheap products to major global players in the past two decades, chaebols have been regarded as drivers behind the unprecedented success of the Korean economy (Amsden, 1989; Chang and Hong, 2000, 2002).”
- Business groups in developing capital markets: Towards a complementarity perspective (2015, background): “widely referred to as the institutional voids perspective, it was adopted by a number of scholars seeking to explain the prevalence of business groups and their strategies (Chang and Hong, 2002; Hoskisson et al., 2004; Khanna and Palepu, 2000a, 2000b; Khanna and Rivkin, 2001).”
- The Performance of Group‐affiliated Firms during Institutional Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Indian Firms (2009, background): “However, there has been a growing interest among management and organizational scholars in this subject, especially as it pertains to emerging economies (e.g. Chang and Hong, 2002; Guillen, 2000; Keister, 1998; Khanna and Palepu, 2000; Khanna and Rivkin, 2001).”
- Diversification and performance: evidence from East Asian firms (2007, background): “Recent strategy research in emerging economy environments (Chang and Hong, 2002; Hoskisson et al., 2000; Khanna and Palepu, 1997; Wan and Hoskisson, 2003) has raised interesting questions about how country differences affect the antecedents and consequences of firm diversification.”
- Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Paragons or Parasites? (2007, background): “Kim (1997) argues that the South Korean groups lobbied for liberalization in the 1980s, and Chari and Gupta (2006) show that in India industries with high presence of group-affiliated firms were more likely to be associated with liberalization of foreign entry in the early 1990s than industries domi”
- What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective (2007, background): “…and Teck (1995) Lin, Ping, and Chiu (2005), Rajan and Pangarkar (2000), Sim and Pandian (2003), Zutschi and Gibbons (1998) South Korea Chang (2003), Chang and Hong (2000, 2002), Chang et al. (2006), Kim et al. (2004a), Lee et al. (2007) Mahmood and Mitchell (2004) Erramilli, Agarwal, and Kim…”
- Japanese keiretsu: Past, present, future (2009, background): “Research has come to no clear consensus regarding the role of business groups in different settings ( Chang & Hong, 2002; Chang & Hong, 2000; Khanna & Palepu, 2000a, b; Khanna & Rivkin, 2001),”