Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence from Biotechnology Clusters

By Philip Cooke. 2002

379 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Urban Studies

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/779fa8ae208e43ad7ad65c2fcfe832adf616c965

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

In Urban Studies

Citations in the corpus

Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality (2019, background): “These universities often play an important role in a region’s innovation culture, for example Cambridge University and the biotechnology and IT clusters in the local area (Cooke 2002; Cooke and Huggins 2003; Hughes and Kitson 2012) and Stanford University within Silicon Valley (Saxenian 1994).”
The Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intention of Young Researchers: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior with the Triple Helix Model (2019, background): “For example, a typical policy in this direction can be seen in Italy with the provision of specific conditions to foster development of a “technological district” (Cooke 2002; Cooke, Heidenreich, and Braczyk 2004).”
Green energy clusters and socio-technical transitions: analysis of a sustainable energy cluster for regional economic development in Central Massachusetts, USA (2012, background): “The Worcester area is a central node in the Massachusetts life sciences super-cluster, which is now one of the largest, best known, and most established centers for biotechnology research and development in the world (Cooke 2002).”
Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach (2017, background): “As such, the concept is closely related to literatures on the national (Lundvall 1992; Freeman 1987, 1995; Edquist 1997) and regional systems of innovation (Autio 1998; Cooke 2002; Doloreux 2002) as well as the more mainstream empirical growth literature that is linking economic growth and developme”
Meeting, mating, and intermediating: How incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems (2020, background): “The business subsystem contains the value network required to commercialize the product and includes various types of enterprises as well as users and clients (Cooke, 2002; Lin et al., 2010).”
The adaptive life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems: the biotechnology cluster (2017, background): “Cooke (2002), studying the networks of innovations in the biotechnology cluster of Cambridge, MA, and Cambridge, England, similarly argues that the regional development of the cluster required a convergence of both public and private initiatives that has facilitated the development of systemic…”
Global technological collaboration network: network analysis of international co-inventions (2012, background): “As external contacts are decisive for a firm’s innovation activities (Asheim and Isaksen 2002; Cooke 2002), modern corporations seek knowledge worldwide (Archibugi and Iammarino 2002; Bartlett and Ghoshal 1990; Doz et al. 2001; Dunning 1988, 1994).”
Agglomeration, clusters, and industrial policy (2013, neutral): “‘Regional innovation systems’ (RIS) models apply these frameworks to specific regions and clusters (Saxenian, 1994; Cooke, 2002; Asheim and Gertler, 2005; Asheim et al. , 2011).”
University spin-off policies and economic development in Less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice (2005, background): “A whole host of concepts have since been developed to explain knowledge-based development in an abstract sense (Storper, 1995; Boekma et al., 2000), such as learning regions (Morgan, 1997), regional innovation systems (Cooke, 2002) and clusters (Porter, 1990).”
The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-Based Regional Development (2005, neutral): “A dual overlapping network of academic research groups and start-up firms, cross-cut with alliances among large firms, universities and the start-ups themselves appears to be the emerging pattern of academic-business intersection in bio-technology, computer science and similar fields (Herrera, 2001;”
The territorial dynamics of innovation in China and India (2012, neutral): “Finally, the literature on regional innovation systems has emphasised regional-level factors, which include universities and public agencies, networks (e.g. public-private partnerships) and local institutions (Cooke, 2002).”