The impact of national culture on corporate social performance
By Dimo Ringov, Maurizio Zollo. 2007
416 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77844ab9d4c815e9cea35753a34f4f82b1b165e3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Marketing
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of national culture on corporate social responsibility: evidence from cross-regional comparison (2015, neutral): “The empirical association between culture and CSR performance is also well documented in the studies of Ringov and Zollo (2007), Ho et al. (2012), and Peng et al. (2012).”
- CSR Communication Intensity in Chinese and Indian Multinational Companies (2009, background): “To fulfill this role, researchers have argued, directors who are outsiders or who are independent are important for corporate legitimacy (Birch & Moon, 2004; Ringov & Zollo, 2007).”
- Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: A global perspective (2020, neutral): “Several other studies, including Park et al. (2007), Ringov (2007), Peng and Lin (2009), Thanetsunthorn (2015) and Gallego-Álvarez and Ortas (2017) also provide consistent evidence.”
- Usage of public corporate communications of social responsibility in Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) (2010, background): “In the West, corporate communication is often used to highlight companies’ commitment to CSR (Esrock and Leichty, 1998; Hooghiemstra, 2000), enhance marketing efforts, and legitimize the companies corporate image in the eyes of various stakeholders (Birch and Moon, 2004; Ringov and Zollo, 2007).”