RELIABILITY IS NOT VALIDITY AND VALIDITY IS NOT RELIABILITY

By Frank L. Schmidt, C. Viswesvaran, Deniz S. Ones. 2000

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7652ca511385db28d0f68f721676664a7a7208e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety Research

1. T. Judge
2. Jenell L. Senter
3. James M. LeBreton
4. J. Bono
5. Ronald F. Piccolo
6. Rajashi Ghosh

In Social Psychology

1. T. Judge
2. R. Ilies
3. J. Bono
4. Bruce J. Avolio
5. Fred Walumbwa
6. Adam M. Grant
7. Ronald F. Piccolo
8. Fred Luthans

In Sociology and Political Science

1. T. Judge
2. R. Ilies
3. J. Bono
4. Ronald F. Piccolo
5. Jenell L. Senter
6. John P. Campbell
7. James M. LeBreton
8. Brenton M. Wiernik

Citations in the corpus

• The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. (2004, background): “Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership: Beyond establishment views (pp. 122–141). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. *Sims, H. P., & Szilagyi, A. D. (1975). Leader structure and subordinate satisfaction for two hospital administrative levels: A path analysis approach.”
• Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement (2008, methodology): “Readers interested in learning more about the use of correlations to index IRR are directed to articles by Viswesvaran, Ones, and Schmidt (1996), Murphy and DeShon (2000a, 2000b), Schmidt et al. (2000), LeBreton et al. (2003), and, most recently, Viswesvaran, Schmidt, and Ones (2005).”