Drivers for Adopting Public Private Partnerships—Empirical Comparison between China and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region

By Albert P. C. Chan, Patrick T. I. Lam, D. Chan, E. Cheung, Yongjian Ke. 2009

118 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/760aceb33bc67779248bd8659a4fabc80142df86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Critical factors and risk allocation for PPP policy: Comparison between HSR and general infrastructure projects (2012, methodology): “1 presents the first-order covariance model based on the previous studies (Chan et al., 2009; Li et al., 2005) for the first and second categories (drivers and CSFs, respectively).”
Cross-country comparisons of key drivers, critical success factors and risk allocation for public-private partnership projects (2015, methodology): “We adopted the key drivers used in Chan et al. (2009) and Chou et al. (2012), which were based on papers, textbooks, research reports, journal articles, conference papers, and online material.”
Critical review on PPP research : a search from the Chinese and international journals (2016, background): “Chan et al. (2009) conducted empirical questionnaire survey to explore and compare the key drivers for adopting PPP in China and Hong Kong.”
Critical success criteria for public-private partnership projects: international experts’ opinion (2017, background): “With PPP schemes, governments are now able to tap into the private sector’s expertise and skills in developing sustainable and modernized public infrastructure (Menard, Peeroo 2011; Chan et al. 2009).”
Risk Factors of Public-Private Partnership Projects in China: Comparison between the Water, Power, and Transportation Sectors (2011, methodology): “The mean score ranking technique is also a common technique used to analyze the results Copyright 2011 by the American Society of Civil Engineers Ac ce pte d M an us cri pt No t C op ye dit ed obtained by questionnaire surveys (Chan et al., 2009; Chan et al., 2010).”