Two Distinct Pathways Leading to Nuclear Apoptosis

By S. Susin, E. Daugas, L. Ravagnan, K. Samejima, N. Zamzami, M. Loeffler, P. Costantini, K. Ferri, T. Irinopoulou, M. Prevost and 5 more. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2000

800 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Apaf-1−/− or caspase-3−/− cells treated with a variety of apoptosis inducers manifest apoptosis-associated alterations including the translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) from mitochondria to nuclei, large scale DNA fragmentation, and initial chromatin condensation (stage I). However, when compared with normal control cells, Apaf-1−/− or caspase-3−/− cells fail to exhibit oligonucleosomal chromatin digestion and a more advanced pattern of chromatin condensation (stage II). Microinjection of such cells with recombinant AIF only causes peripheral chromatin condensation (stage I), whereas microinjection with activated caspase-3 or its downstream target caspase-activated DNAse (CAD) causes a more pronounced type of chromatin condensation (stage II). Similarly, when added to purified HeLa nuclei, AIF causes stage I chromatin condensation and large-scale DNA fragmentation, whereas CAD induces stage II chromatin condensation and oligonucleosomal DNA degradation. Furthermore, in a cell-free system, concomitant neutralization of AIF and CAD is required to suppress the nuclear DNA loss caused by cytoplasmic extracts from apoptotic wild-type cells. In contrast, AIF depletion alone suffices to suppress the nuclear DNA loss contained in extracts from apoptotic Apaf-1−/− or caspase-3−/− cells. As a result, at least two redundant parallel pathways may lead to chromatin processing during apoptosis. One of these pathways involves Apaf-1 and caspases, as well as CAD, and leads to oligonucleosomal DNA fragmentation and advanced chromatin condensation. The other pathway, which is caspase-independent, involves AIF and leads to large-scale DNA fragmentation and peripheral chromatin condensation.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75eaf9a6d9ecb7de58d39832e804b2abdaef4f58

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Guido Kroemer
  2. Jerry M. Adams
  3. A. Strasser
  4. Seamus J. Martin
  5. Susan A. Elmore
  6. H. Ahsan
  7. M. S. Ola
  8. M. Nawaz

In Nutrition and Dietetics

  1. A. Strasser
  2. Guido Kroemer

Citations in the corpus