Out of the Disability Closet: Strategic use of perception management by select university students with disabilities

By M. Olney, Karin F. Brockelman. 2003

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/758bcf59dc27d08429913830e970da3780da5949

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Manuel Madriaga
2. Gregor Wolbring
3. Ozcan Konur
4. A. Vaccaro
5. J. Pachankis
6. Ruth Rentschler
7. Emily Hutcheon

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Manuel Madriaga
2. Gregor Wolbring
3. Ozcan Konur
4. J. Pachankis
5. Emily Hutcheon

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Emily Hutcheon
2. Manuel Madriaga
3. Gregor Wolbring
4. Ozcan Konur
5. A. Vaccaro
6. J. Pachankis
7. Ruth Rentschler
8. B. Newman

Citations in the corpus

• Voices of "Disabled" Post Secondary Students: Examining Higher Education "Disability" Policy Using an Ableism Lens (2012, methodology): “This self-selection process has been successfully used in other studies (Barnard-Brak, 2010; Dole, 1999; Holloway, 2001; Olney & Brockelman, 2003).”
• Enduring disablism: students with dyslexia and their pathways into UK higher education and beyond (2007, background): “They want to steer away from the labels and categories that have been imposed on them while in school (Olney & Brockelman, 2003 ).”
• ‘Bringing everyone on the same journey’: revisiting inclusion in higher education (2019, background): “This assumption highlights impairment pathologies for people with disabilities (Olney and Brockelman 2003, 45) and focuses on individual impairments, diverting 2 A. COLLINS ET AL. attention from the need for collective political solutions that can change disabling social and physical environments…”
• The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: a cognitive-affective-behavioral model. (2007, background): “…DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.328 328 ment theory (e.g., K. Greene et al., 2003; Petronio, 2002), strategic perception management (e.g., Olney & Brockelman, 2003), identity management theory (e.g., Cain, 1991; Clair, Beatty, & MacLean, 2005; Woods & Harbeck, 1991), and cognitive…”
• Redefining Disability, Re-imagining the Self: Disability Identification Predicts Self-esteem and Strategic Responses to Stigma (2013, background): “By contrast, those in the disability community who endorse the social model contest pathologizing portrayals and claim that disability can be a life-enriching experience, a positive cultural heritage or centrally defining aspect of identity (Gill, 1995; Grandin, 1996; Olney & Brockelman, 2003).”
• Teaching the ‘invisible’ disabled students in the classroom: disclosure, inclusion and the social model of disability (2009, unknown): “2007 ; Olney and Brockelman 2003 ; Palfreyman-Kay 1998 ; Roy 2003 , 79).”
• Teaching disabled students in higher education (2006, background): “In such a study, Olney and Brockelman (2003) examined the disability disclosure by the LD and other disabled university students in the US.”
• A Sense of Belonging Among College Students With Disabilities: An Emergent Theoretical Model (2015, background): “…students with disabilities (Barnard-Brak et al., 2010), yet researchers have found that students often choose not to disclose their disability upon entering college (Belch 2011; Hadley, 2006; Megivern et al., 2003; Olney & Brokelman, 2003; Wagner et  al., 2005; Vickerman & Blundell, 2010).”