Relational meaning and discrete emotions.

By R. Lazarus. 2001

529 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7555c6dc5e89e94432010c8fdc4a78d13fe8f7ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Anger, Fear, or Sadness: Faculty Members' Emotional Reactions to Collective Pay Disadvantage (2008, background): “These general patterns echo Lazarus' (2001) description of anger as the experience of a "demeaning offense against me and mine" and sadness as the experience of "an irrevocable loss.”
Reexamining Fear Appeal Models from Cognitive Appraisal Theory and Functional Emotion Theory Perspectives (2016, background): “Cognitive appraisal theory of emotion (Lazarus, 1991a, 2001) postulates that emotions are activated by cognitive appraisal of the personally relevant circumstances.”
Emotion and Learning: Feeling Our Way toward a New Theory of Reflection in Service-Learning. (2006, background): “Lazarus (2001) explained that the term cognitive appraisal “emphasize[s] the complex, judgmental, and conscious process that must often be involved in appraising” an event (p. 51).”
Emotional Responses to Art: From Collation and Arousal to Cognition and Emotion (2005, background): “Asserting that objective events cause emotions creates difficult problems, such as why people respond differently to the same event ( Lazarus, 2001; Roseman & Smith, 2001).”
Relative Deprivation (2012, background): “One could characterize RD as a relational theme (Lazarus, 2001) or interconnected beliefs (Kessler & Mummendey, 2002) in which deserving, anger, and resentment are key characteristics of a larger narrative (see Folger, 1987).”
Emotion recognition using a hierarchical binary decision tree approach (2011, methodology): “Our framework is motivated by the Appraisal Theory [11] of emotions.”
Understanding the Role of Teacher Appraisals in Shaping the Dynamics of their Relationships with Students: Deconstructing Teachers’ Judgments of Disruptive Behavior/Students (2009, methodology): “Sympathy Yes Yes Maybe Maybe Deactivating Involves sorrow or concern for the distressed or needy others (Eisenberg 2000) a The core relational themes were drawn from Lazarus (2001) b The core relational themes were drawn from Tharpe et al. (2000) 102 M.-L.”
Theories of psychological stress at work (2012, background): “The authority of appraisals lies in the fact that they act as a bridge to what one experiences and how one feels in a particular encounter (Lazarus, 2001 ) .”
Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. (2004, background): “According to Lazarus (2001), when engaged in problem-focused coping, “a person obtains information on which to act and mobilizes actions for the purpose of changing the Martijn van Zomeren, Russell Spears, and Agneta H. Fischer, Social Psychology Program, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the…”
Collective Emotions in Conflict Situations: Societal Implications (2007, background): “From the perspective of appraisal theorists, the manner in which a person interprets a certain environmental stimulus has a decisive effect on the emotion that he or she will develop (see Arnold, 1960; Lazarus, 2001; Roseman, 1984).”
Cognitive Appraisals and Interest in Visual Art: Exploring an Appraisal Theory of Aesthetic Emotions (2005, background): “Appraisals need to be fast because the environment can change quickly (Lazarus, 2001).”
A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion (2004, background): “However, appraisal should not be construed as a deliberate process in itself, but rather a reflexive assessment of the current mental state, which may or may not have been elaborated by deliberation (Lazarus, 2001pp. 178-180).”
An Appraisal Perspective of Teacher Burnout: Examining the Emotional Work of Teachers (2009, background): “Table 1 outlines how teachers’ judgments of misbehaviors may systematically vary to produce different unpleasant emotions ( Lazarus 2001; Roseman and Smith 2001).”
TARGET ARTICLE: Does the Positive Psychology Movement Have Legs? (2003, unknown): “This target article and my invited address in San Francisco at the American Psychological Association (Lazarus, 2001b) meeting are consequences of this struggle.”
The chain of effects from authenticity cues to purchase intention: The role of emotions and restaurant image (2020, background): “Cognitive appraisal theory Cognitive appraisal theory was originally developed by psychologists to determine how an interpretation of an event elicits emotions by appraising a stimulus, which then induces positive or negative emotions (Lazarus, 2001; Roseman & Smith, 2001).”