Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960

By John Hagedoorn. 2002

1,929 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/753b70e0b85e3aee0d39a36e444435a3c051a69b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Determinants and Archetype Users of Open Innovation (2009, background): “Past contributions have emphasised how firm-external factors, such as partner advantages (Hagedoorn, 2002), spillovers (De Bondt, 1997), or environmental pressures (Belderbos et al., 2004) drive the externalisation of R&D activities beyond the boundary of the firm.”
Biotechnology entrepreneurial scientists and their collaborations (2004, background): “funding, equipment, technological know-how and materials), scientific collaborations in biotechnology require collaborations across various institutional settings and disciplines—including between scientists within the same university, between scientists in different universities, and between academ”
Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: mapping the travels of `networks' between economic sociology and economic geography (2006, background): “…with the more recent shift from enduring joint ventures to short-term non-equity partnerships, such as R&D pacts and joint development agreements (Hagedoorn, 2002), strategic alliances have turned into much more ephemeral phenomena that, by their very nature, elude a quintessential geographical…”
Cooperative R&D and firm performance (2004, background): “The observed substantial increase in R&D alliances in the late 1980s and throughout the 1990s, in particular in sectors such as biotechnology and information technology (Hagedoorn, 2002; Tyler and Steensma, 1995) has provoked a substantial academic and policy interest in the phenomenon.”
Exploration, Exploitation and Co-evolution in Innovation Networks (2003, methodology): “…a more specific interest in the relation between (inter-)firm behaviour and industrycharacteristics by making the generic differentiation between high-tech, medium-tech and low-tech industries (e.g. Hagedoorn & Duysters 1999, Hagedoorn 2002), as also used in OECD studies (see e.g. OECD 1992, 1997).”
Standing out from the crowd: the visibility-enhancing effects of IPO-related signals on alliance formation by entrepreneurial firms (2007, background): “The growth rate in the IT sector was even more significant (Hagedoorn, 2002; Halevy, 2000; Lavie, forthcoming).”
Technological Collaboration: Bridging the Innovation Gap between Small and Large Firms** (2010, neutral): “Indeed, over the last two decades the use of external networks by firms of all sizes has increased tremendously (Hagedoorn 2002, 1996).”
Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (2015, background): “R&D cooperation has played an increasing role in firms' innovative activities (Hagedoorn, 2002).”
The Spatial Evolution of Innovation Networks: A Proximity Perspective (2010, background): “The role of networks in innovation processes has become a key research area in the field of innovation studies over the last decade and a half (Freeman 1991; Powell et al. 1996; Hagedoorn 2002).”
Connecting local entrepreneurial ecosystems to global innovation networks: open innovation, double networks and knowledge integration (2011, background): “Concerning collaboration, joint ventures largely have been replaced by contractual partnerships (Hagedoorn, 2002).”
Aerospace Clusters: Local or Global Knowledge Spillovers? (2005, background): “Hagedoorn ( 2002 ) points out that international R&D partnering in aerospace and defence is well above the average compared to other high‐tech industries.”
Innovator networks and regional knowledge base (2008, background): “There exists an alternative explanation of an inventor occurring at patents of different applicants, which we label ”hidden cooperation”: Many cooperating firms decide to divide the patents that result from their cooperation among themselves (Hagedoorn 2002).”