Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective

By Lei-da Chen, Mark Lee Gillenson, Daniel L. Sherrell. Information Manager (The), 2002

1,516 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75057b2d3ec68f6933278b659b54f81bd44187d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

An empirical examination of the acceptance behaviour of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model (2008, background): “Most studies on technology acceptance showed that perceived ease of use directly influenced perceived usefulness and attitude towards use (e.g., Ahn et al., 2004; Bruner & Kumar, 2005; Chen et al., 2002; Davis et al., 1989).”
What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model (2005, methodology): “ximate number of times the user uses MC in a [6]”
Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM (2007, neutral): “These include Web browsers (Morris & Dillon, 1997), the use of Websites (Lederer, Maupin, Sena, & Zhuang, 2002; Lin & Lu, 2002; van der Heijden, 2003), Web retailing ( Chen, Gillenson, & Sherrell, 2002; Ocass & Fenech, 2003), online purchase intentions (van der Heijden, Verhagen, & Creemers, 2003),”
Factors Influencing Online Shopping Behavior: The Mediating Role of Purchase Intention (2016, neutral): “(Chen, Gillenson & Sherrell, 2002).”
The role of the technology acceptance model in explaining effects of image interactivity technology on consumer responses (2006, methodology): “In particular, the present study corroborates previous findings of the effect of perceived usefulness on attitude toward the online retailer (Chen et al., 2002; Childers et al., 2001; Chen and Tan, 2004; Gefen and Straub, 1997; Koufaris, 2002; Lin and Lu, 2000; O’Cass and Fenech, 2003; Vijayasarathy”
Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience (2004, background): “Similarly, numerous extended variables with specific contexts have been added to TAM, such as perceived enjoyment (PET) in using the Internet [78], perceived critical mass (PCM) in groupware usage [56], perceived user resources (PR) in bulletin board systems [58], compatibility in virtual stores [15”
The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls (2004, background): “In addition, a number of recent studies have successfully adopted TAM to study the acceptance of Internet related technologies [6,7,20,22,25].”
What drives consumers to shop online? A literature review (2004, methodology): “Exogenous factors TAM is criticized for ignoring the social influence on technology acceptance (Chen et al., 2002; Moon and Kim, 2001).”
Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance (2004, background): “[15] showed that a consumer’s behavioral intention to use a virtual store was a significant predictor of his or her actual use of the virtual store.”
An Empirical Study of Consumer Switching from Traditional to Electronic Channels: A Purchase-Decision Process Perspective (2004, background): “Many researchers have studied consumer demographics, the technological characteristics of virtual stores, and the unique ability of the Internet medium to provide interactive and personalized on-line shopping experiences [17, 47, 54, 55, 56, 74, 81].”